Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/45624
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorDRAGALINA-CHERNAYA, ELENA-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-27T18:02:15Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-27T18:02:15Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-
dc.identifier.citationDRAGALINA-CHERNAYA E. THE VARIETY OF INVARIANCE IN FORMAL AND REGIONAL ONTOLOGIES. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2024, vol. 13 issue 1, pp. 15–32.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2024-13-1-15-32-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/45624-
dc.description.abstractThe paper examines the invariance principles proposed by the analytical and phenomenological traditions for demarcating the boundaries of formal and regional ontologies. The principle of invariance with respect to isomorphic transformations, generalizing Alfred Tarski’s criterion for logical concepts, is extended to formal ontology as the theory of manifolds in its phenomenological interpretation. Isomorphism types, which are abstract individuals of the highest order, hypostases of forms of all possible ontologies, are considered as model-theoretical analogs of manifolds. The correlativity of the phenomenological principles of demarcation of ontological regions and the criterion of invariance with respect to isomorphic transformations is demonstrated, leading to the convergence of logic and formal mathematics in both traditions and, at the same time, to the exclusion of geometry from formal ontology. Particular attention is paid to the discussion of the analytical and phenomenological traditions of the synthetic (material) a priori and the contribution that Wittgenstein’s doctrine on internal relations at different stages of its evolution makes to this discussion. The paper reveals the basis for later Wittgenstein’s criticism of his earlier project of creating a phenomenological language for expressing internal regional relations (such as the colours exclusion). The paper shows how Wittgenstein’s doubts about the possibility of an ideal notation based on the dichotomy of the logical and phenomenological led him to the study of invariants arising in language games. These invariants are not determined by the special properties of the categorical objects of formal ontology or the structures of regional subject matter, but are stable equilibria generated by the “consensus of actions.” New perspectives are outlined that are opened for logic and phenomenology by switching focus from the invariants of ontological structures to the invariants of structured interactions of various agents.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe article was prepared within the framework of the project “International academic cooperation” HSE University.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHorizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 13; Issue 1-
dc.subjectinvarianceen_GB
dc.subjectformal ontologyen_GB
dc.subjectregional ontologyen_GB
dc.subjectmanifolden_GB
dc.subjectisomorphismen_GB
dc.subjectinternal relationen_GB
dc.subjectlanguage gameen_GB
dc.titleTHE VARIETY OF INVARIANCE IN FORMAL AND REGIONAL ONTOLOGIESen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
02_Драгалина-Черная-15-32.pdf683,51 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.