Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44580
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | DÍAZ ÁLVAREZ, JESÚS M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | BRIOSO, JORGE | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-10T21:24:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-10T21:24:27Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | DÍAZ ÁLVAREZ JESÚS M., BRIOSO JORGE. SERRANO DE HARO AGUSTÍN. THE PHILOSOPHER AND HIS PHILOSOPHIES. ORTEGA, HUSSERLIAN PHENOMENOLOGY AND BEYOND. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2023, vol. 12 issue 2, pp. 285–301. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2023-12-2-285-301 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44580 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article tries to unravel some of the main clues provided by Ortega on his understanding of philosophy. The thesis we defend is that the Spanish philosopher maintains two slightly different answers concerning the question what is philosophy, though Ortega does not acknowledge them in the explicit narrative of his thinking. This, we believe, creates tensions in his late second philosophical model, as he does not fully break away from certain “adherence” or “mannerisms” associated to his early model. In this respect, Ortega would be a thinker who lives between two philosophical worlds, someone who sees, narrates and interprets the philosophical shock wave occurring at his time, but does not quite let go of the old intellectual constructions. To support our thesis, we will compare two texts, his 1929 lectures What is Philosophy?, and his Notes on Thinking, from 1941. In the period between these two works, Ortega seems to move from a more “traditional,” “universalistic,” “transcendental,” in short, Husserlian phenomenological understanding of philosophy, to a more historicist, hermeneutical, and pragmatic one, which lays the emphasis on the plurality of discourses on the sense, the contingency of the philosophical narrative itself, and even the very possibility of its ending, at least in its more “metaphysical” and classical form. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | This essay was written with the support of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. Research Project The Ibero-American Philosophy of the XXth Century and the Development of Plural Reason (PLURIBER PID2022–138121NB-IOO). | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 12; Issue 2 | - |
dc.subject | philosophy | en_GB |
dc.subject | husserlian phenomenology | en_GB |
dc.subject | universalism | en_GB |
dc.subject | hermeneutics | en_GB |
dc.subject | historicism | en_GB |
dc.subject | human condition | en_GB |
dc.subject | end of philosophy | en_GB |
dc.title | THE PHILOSOPHER AND HIS PHILOSOPHIES. ORTEGA, HUSSERLIAN PHENOMENOLOGY AND BEYOND | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 2 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
03_Diaz.pdf | 632,16 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.