Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38909
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | CHERNAVIN, GEORGY | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-27T12:57:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-27T12:57:02Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | CHERNAVIN G. THE “WATERWHEEL” OF GUILT: THE TAUTOLOGY OF CONSCIENCE IN WITTGENSTEIN’S NOTES. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2022, vol. 11 issue 2, pp. 544–557. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-2-544-557 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38909 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The implicit conception of conscience from Ludwig Wittgenstein’s notes from 1929 is brought into comparison with the theory of conscience as a paradoxical identity of guilt and innocence by Philip Konrad Marheineke (which served as a pattern for Kierkegaardian concept of “despair”) and of conscience as a (grammatical and temporal) redoubling by Vladimir Jankélévitch. Wittgensteinian views on conscience and feeling of guilt tend to Marheineke-Kierkegaard’s model (the guilt hides in innocence and vice versa) and to Jankélévitch’s model (the wrongdoing from the past makes us regret the innocence which preceded it in a far remote past). I explore these tautological models of conscience using the example of Wittgensteinian metaphor of “waterwheel”: of an engineering failure producing a constant sentiment of guilt. Austrian philosopher describes his “incapacity to think” as a source of background, freely floating guilt. “Uselessness” and “mediocrity” or as he puts it “groundlessness of your own existence” altogether with “incapacity to think” — those are the self-accusations of the thinker. This torturing state he at the same time considers to be the source of his own philosophical productivity. Would a conscience be possible which would be free of this tautological structure and of this endless “rumination” of the petty guilt? The article proposes a hypothesis how one could break the tautological circle of an idling scrupulous conscience. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | The article was prepared within the framework of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research research project No. 18-011-00582 “The Late Wittgenstein Method: Reduction (Devaluation) of Traditional Problems of Metaphysics to a Philosophical Puzzle”. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | ru | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 11; Issue 2 | - |
dc.subject | guilt | en_GB |
dc.subject | Wittgenstein | en_GB |
dc.subject | Kierkegaard | en_GB |
dc.subject | Marheineke | en_GB |
dc.subject | conscience | en_GB |
dc.subject | tautology | en_GB |
dc.subject | Jankélévitch | en_GB |
dc.title | THE “WATERWHEEL” OF GUILT: THE TAUTOLOGY OF CONSCIENCE IN WITTGENSTEIN’S NOTES | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 2 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
03_Chernavin.pdf | 916,38 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.