Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/37075
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorMOLCHANOV, VICTOR-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-07T12:29:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-07T12:29:49Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-
dc.identifier.citationMOLCHANOV V. EPOCHE AND ANXIETY. NEUTRALIZATION OF THE WORLD OR THE IMITATION OF EXPERIENCE?. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2022, vol. 11 issue 1, pp. 11–26.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-11-26-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/37075-
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses Husserl’s “epoche” and “phenomenological reduction” and early Heidegger’s “fear” and “anxiety” from a conceptual and terminological point of view. The basis for comparing “epoche” and “fear” is their main function of neutralizing the world. The author also considers the way of correlating the epoche and anxiety as philosophical concepts with three types of realizable experience that served as their source. The main points and stages of the introduction of the term “epoche” are highlighted; the main functional differences between the terms “epoche” and “phenomenological reduction” in various works of Husserl are indicated. A number of Husserl’s attempts to transform the methodological principles put forward by him into a description of a special experience of detachment, accessible through moral efforts, courage and honesty, are considered. In this regard, the transformation of Cartesian doubt into the procedure of “epoche” through the artificial procedure of “attempt at doubt” is analyzed. Three types of restrictions on the universality of the epoche are distinguished. Terminological and meaningful relationships between neutralization as a mode of consciousness and the epoche are considered. Two main differences are revealed, with the help of which Husserl tries to transform principles into experience: the difference between positional and neutral consciousness (primary and shadow one) and the difference between an epoche and a quasi-epoche. Husserl’s interpretation of the epoche and reduction as a special experience has two main sources: first, the experience of the imagination, or fantasy, and in this sense the source of the epoche is the quasi-epoche, and not vice versa. Secondly, the postulate of the identity of sensation from the real and illusory object. Heidegger’s distinction between fear and anxiety is critically analyzed. The author comes to the conclusion that a common source of the phenomena of anxiety, fear, horror, fright, and so on consists in the collision and mutual penetration of various human worlds. It is impossible to distance oneself from this diversity; further, it is the true source of philosophical reflection.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 20-011-00842 “Formation and Transformation of Concepts in Phenomenological Philosophy. History of Terms and Discussions.”en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHorizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 11; Issue 1-
dc.subjectepocheen_GB
dc.subjectquasi-epocheen_GB
dc.subjectanxietyen_GB
dc.subjectneutralizationen_GB
dc.subjectworlden_GB
dc.subjectexperienceen_GB
dc.subjectdoubten_GB
dc.subjectattempt at doubten_GB
dc.subjecttransformationen_GB
dc.subjectworlden_GB
dc.titleEPOCHE AND ANXIETY. NEUTRALIZATION OF THE WORLD OR THE IMITATION OF EXPERIENCE?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
01_Molchanov.pdf652,43 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.