Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33407
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFomenko, Andrey N.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-02T15:25:58Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-02T15:25:58Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier.citationFomenko, Andrey. “Beyond the Threshold of the Visible: The Photographic Objects of Alexander Ugay”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts 11, no. 2 (2021): 263–287.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2021.206-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/33407-
dc.description.abstractOne of the features of photography is the fact that the process of formation of the image is invisible — in contrast to painting. It is as if photography, which makes the world more visible, evades visual control. The transition to digital techniques partly reduces this “dark side” of photography, but it also allows us to make better sense of analogous photography and reflect on its dual nature. Alexander Ugay, a contemporary artist from Kazakhstan, who in his practice shifts from photography as an image to photography as an object, substance and process, is an example of such a reflection; the thematization of the nature of the medium is combined in his practice with the theme of memory and oblivion. In his Objects of Memory (2013), he photographed the back of pictures from several archives of the Stalinist camps — the procedure that emphasizes the material and ephemeral character of the prints. The iconic aspect is almost entirely excluded from Time Capsule (2011 — present time) that reveals the self-destructive nature of the act of taking picture. The series of “obscuratons” (2017–2018) — complex pinhole cameras with a lot of holes — is a preliminary result of this reflection of photographic dialectics of the visible and the invisible. Every obscuraton functions alternately as a devise for creating an image (equivalent to human vision) and as an object integrated in some environment side by side with the other things. The polemics with an idea of total visual control can be read here; the machines of vision prove to be machines of blindness. The general impression is that the sole purpose of the emphasis on physical and chemical processes, the use of the particular iconographic resources and references to historical realities have a single goal in Ugay’s projects: the dissolution of meanings and disintegration of forms.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. Arts;Volume 11; Issue 2-
dc.subjectAlexander Ugayen_GB
dc.subjectphotographyen_GB
dc.subjectcontemporary arten_GB
dc.subjectart of Kazakhstanen_GB
dc.subjectcamera obscuraen_GB
dc.subjectobscuratonen_GB
dc.subjectpanopticismen_GB
dc.subjectpost-photographyen_GB
dc.subjectneo-avant-gardeen_GB
dc.subjectentropyen_GB
dc.titleBeyond the Threshold of the Visible: The Photographic Objects of Alexander Ugayen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Appears in Collections:Issue 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
263-287.pdf4,15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.