Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/29536
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorKŪLIS, RIHARDS-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T11:02:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-23T11:02:44Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.citationKŪLIS R. HEIDEGGER’S BEING, RAHNER’S GOD: IS THE QUESTION STILL RELEVANT OR ALREADY ANSWERED? Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2021, vol. 10, issue 1, pp. 108–122.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2021-10-1-108-122-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/29536-
dc.description.abstractThe secularized and rational-oriented mindset of the Western civilization does not preclude important elements of a religious worldview. The objective of the present study is to come to understand the role the categories of Being and God play in the present day spiritual situation. Heidegger’s and Rahner’s views are considered here within the prospective of the paradigmatic process. The latter marks the fading away of the classical understanding of God and search for new and divine meanings. Therefore I suggest considering some of the most significant motifs in the two philosophers’ reflection as regards the history of western civilization and our epoch in the context of the categories of God and Being. Among these motifs there are such attitudes as subjectivism, self-suggestion, disposal of beings, planetarism, oblivion of Being, loss of origins, groundlessness, alienation, situation of meaninglessness. It is due to these attitudes, especially owing to meaninglessness, that many people tend to raise again the issue of the concealed, the encompassing, God or Being. Or perhaps speaking about “Being” and “God” can be interpreted as something that leads to the oblivion of Being and to atheism. “Being” in Heidegger and “God” in Rahner single out the existential centre to which forms of life are related. Nowadays it is forgotten or even vanishes. “God” or “Being” hold everything together and confer meaning thereto. Could it be exactly what modern man is in search of? One has to find answers to these questions.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis paper has been produced within the framework and as a part of the project VPP LV, 6.1. “Ontology of Language”.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHorizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 10; Issue 1-
dc.subjectbeingen_GB
dc.subjectGoden_GB
dc.subject“the fate of being"en_GB
dc.subjectconcealeden_GB
dc.subjectencompassingen_GB
dc.subjectsubjectivismen_GB
dc.subjectself-suggestionen_GB
dc.subjectdisposal of beingsen_GB
dc.subjectgroundlessnessen_GB
dc.subjectmeaninglessnessen_GB
dc.titleHEIDEGGER’S BEING, RAHNER’S GOD: IS THE QUESTION STILL RELEVANT OR ALREADY ANSWERED?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
108-122.pdf648,38 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.