Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/29536
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | KŪLIS, RIHARDS | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-23T11:02:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-23T11:02:44Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-03 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | KŪLIS R. HEIDEGGER’S BEING, RAHNER’S GOD: IS THE QUESTION STILL RELEVANT OR ALREADY ANSWERED? Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2021, vol. 10, issue 1, pp. 108–122. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2021-10-1-108-122 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/29536 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The secularized and rational-oriented mindset of the Western civilization does not preclude important elements of a religious worldview. The objective of the present study is to come to understand the role the categories of Being and God play in the present day spiritual situation. Heidegger’s and Rahner’s views are considered here within the prospective of the paradigmatic process. The latter marks the fading away of the classical understanding of God and search for new and divine meanings. Therefore I suggest considering some of the most significant motifs in the two philosophers’ reflection as regards the history of western civilization and our epoch in the context of the categories of God and Being. Among these motifs there are such attitudes as subjectivism, self-suggestion, disposal of beings, planetarism, oblivion of Being, loss of origins, groundlessness, alienation, situation of meaninglessness. It is due to these attitudes, especially owing to meaninglessness, that many people tend to raise again the issue of the concealed, the encompassing, God or Being. Or perhaps speaking about “Being” and “God” can be interpreted as something that leads to the oblivion of Being and to atheism. “Being” in Heidegger and “God” in Rahner single out the existential centre to which forms of life are related. Nowadays it is forgotten or even vanishes. “God” or “Being” hold everything together and confer meaning thereto. Could it be exactly what modern man is in search of? One has to find answers to these questions. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | This paper has been produced within the framework and as a part of the project VPP LV, 6.1. “Ontology of Language”. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 10; Issue 1 | - |
dc.subject | being | en_GB |
dc.subject | God | en_GB |
dc.subject | “the fate of being" | en_GB |
dc.subject | concealed | en_GB |
dc.subject | encompassing | en_GB |
dc.subject | subjectivism | en_GB |
dc.subject | self-suggestion | en_GB |
dc.subject | disposal of beings | en_GB |
dc.subject | groundlessness | en_GB |
dc.subject | meaninglessness | en_GB |
dc.title | HEIDEGGER’S BEING, RAHNER’S GOD: IS THE QUESTION STILL RELEVANT OR ALREADY ANSWERED? | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 1 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
108-122.pdf | 648,38 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.