Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/11815
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.advisorЛоскутников Константин Генриховичru_RU
dc.contributor.authorИванова Елена Владимировнаru_RU
dc.contributor.authorIvanova Elenaen_GB
dc.contributor.editorКовалевская Наталья Владимировнаru_RU
dc.contributor.editorKovalevskaia Natalia Vlаdimirovnаen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-25T20:35:26Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-25T20:35:26Z-
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.other048052en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/11815-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is focused on the Self/Other nexus in Russia’s European discourse. The narrative of Russia as “a part of the European family” has not been seriously challenged in Russian political discourse since the late 1980s, when the idea of the “Common European Home” was introduced and espoused. Ever since, Russian leaders have been referring to Russia’s historical and cultural affinities with the European milieu and its alleged congruity with European political logic. Russia’s self-distancing from Europe has become evident with the conservative and civilizational turn that solidified itself in Russian political discourse circa 2011-2012. This thesis seeks to find out how the Self/Other nexus in Russia’s official political discourse on EU-Russia relations is being constructed. The analysis is structured along several questions: by what means and to what end the EU and Russia recourse to Othering; how many strategies of Othering are possible; whether it is possible to deal with the ideas of “sameness” and “otherness” without falling into negative dynamics; how certain articulations reproduce narratives of Russia’s distinct Self in its European discourse; what kind of narrative appears to replace the narrative of Russia’s alleged belongingness to the European milieu. The study is based on combination of constructivist and poststructuralist premises. Russia and the EU are approached from the point of view of their conflictual intersubjectivity, which refers to EU-Russia relations as interactions of two ontologically dislocated and unfixed subjects dependent on the figure of a symbolic Other. Discourses are approached as not only products of actions, but as actions themselves or as least shaping which actions are within the possible.ru_RU
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is focused on the Self/Other nexus in Russia’s European discourse. The narrative of Russia as “a part of the European family” has not been seriously challenged in Russian political discourse since the late 1980s, when the idea of the “Common European Home” was introduced and espoused. Ever since, Russian leaders have been referring to Russia’s historical and cultural affinities with the European milieu and its alleged congruity with European political logic. Russia’s self-distancing from Europe has become evident with the conservative and civilizational turn that solidified itself in Russian political discourse circa 2011-2012. This thesis seeks to find out how the Self/Other nexus in Russia’s official political discourse on EU-Russia relations is being constructed. The analysis is structured along several questions: by what means and to what end the EU and Russia recourse to Othering; how many strategies of Othering are possible; whether it is possible to deal with the ideas of “sameness” and “otherness” without falling into negative dynamics; how certain articulations reproduce narratives of Russia’s distinct Self in its European discourse; what kind of narrative appears to replace the narrative of Russia’s alleged belongingness to the European milieu. The study is based on combination of constructivist and poststructuralist premises. Russia and the EU are approached from the point of view of their conflictual intersubjectivity, which refers to EU-Russia relations as interactions of two ontologically dislocated and unfixed subjects dependent on the figure of a symbolic Other. Discourses are approached as not only products of actions, but as actions themselves or as least shaping which actions are within the possible.en_GB
dc.language.isoru
dc.subjectinternational relationsru_RU
dc.subjectintersubjectivityru_RU
dc.subjectdiscourse analysisru_RU
dc.subjectOtheringru_RU
dc.subjectRussiaru_RU
dc.subjectEuropean Unionru_RU
dc.subjectforeign policyru_RU
dc.subjectinternational relationsen_GB
dc.subjectintersubjectivityen_GB
dc.subjectdiscourse analysisen_GB
dc.subjectOtheringen_GB
dc.subjectRussiaen_GB
dc.subjectEuropean Unionen_GB
dc.subjectforeign policyen_GB
dc.titleRussia's European discourse: Self–other relationsen_GB
dc.title.alternativeКонцептуальная оппозиция «свой-чужой» в европейском дискурсе Россииru_RU
Располагается в коллекциях:MASTER'S STUDIES



Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.