Digital vigilantism: Performance versus reality?
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
St Petersburg State University
Abstract
The article continues the series of publications by the research team devoted to the
introduction of the “digital vigilantism” concept into Russian academic discourse.
The authors examine the subjects and actors of public governance in the digital
world, sovereignty of the vigilante movement, organizational structures of groups,
social practices, values, aesthetics and stylistics of actions, mythology and discourse
of online vigilante communities. The interdisciplinary character of this research is
manifested in the fact that not only issues of public politics and social philosophy, but
also culture studies, ethics, sociolinguistics and aesthetics are taken into consideration.
As revealed by the authors of the study, the nature of digital Russian vigilantism
as a notable civil society phenomenon is ambivalent. On the one hand, it can be
viewed as a response to the limited management abilities of public institutions in a
changed communication environment, compensating their inability to work with
civil society, yet on the other hand, such activist groups can also demonstrate deviant
behavior online and even claim to exercise violence, challenging the state monopoly.
The purpose of the research team was identifying the ability of vigilante groups to
shape and articulate public values, form public strategies to defend the interests of
civil society, and influence other civil society institutions by imposing their worldview
on them. An analysis of the institutionalized vigilante groups “StopHam”, “Lev
Protiv”, “Hrjuschi Protiv” and “AntiDealer”, “Sober Yards” and “Sorok sorokov” was
carried out for this purpose. The authors point out the non-political nature of the
movements, whose activities focus on social spheres of high importance to the general
public, but conclude that the formation of a digital environment of trust and
cooperation is threatened by aggressive online initiatives and the non-civic nature
of digital activism.
Description
Citation
Kulakova T. A., Volkova A. V. Digital vigilantism: Performance versus reality? Philosophy of the History of Philosophy, 2021, vol. 2, рр. 107–125. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu34.2021.107 (In Russian)