Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/8970
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Burtsev, Vladimir A. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-29T09:44:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-29T09:44:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-12 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Burtsev V. A. The Problem of Subjectivity in a Discourse in Terms of Imperative Sentences. Vestnik SPbSU. Language and Literature, 2017, vol. 14, issue 4, pp. 567–582. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | 10.21638/11701/spbu09.2017.406 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/8970 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article discusses the use of imperative sentences in the Russian Orthodox sermon. In such sentences, we observe the phenomenon of grammatizing their typical functioning which is a means of expressing the psychological state of the speaker. However, their use in preaching is characterized by the fact that the meaning of the utterance as that of a speech act does not depend on the locative activity of the speaker. This phenomenon is seen as asubjectivation, or the submission of the speaker, who acts as a bearer of someone else’s point of view that dominates him. The article studies the conditions of asubjectivation that regulate such submission. They include referential conditions: a) all non-confirmed sentence predications and sentential groups expressing them are referential irrespective of the speaker; b) referential properties of non-confirmed sentential groups are based on the fact that they can be replaced by other groups, as the meaning is conveyed not by the speech units but by their correlations; c) only specific expressions can be used to replace other units, and the meaning of non-confirmed sentential groups cannot be arbitrary. The article shows that asubjectivation is directly related to the fact that the language of the sermon is a discourse. The use of such sentences in a deictic mode, which is not possible in a discourse, shows the absence of asubjectivation. Asubjectivation seen in sentences that have an illocutive verb in their structure is explained by the performative hypothesis. The meaning of imperative sentences in a sermon is defined on the basis of peremptory rules of satisfaction and subjective justification. It has been found that as a result of asubjectivation, in a sermon, imperative sentences are used idiomatically — as an indirect request /piece of advice and cannot be used non-idiomatically as a requirement / order. Refs 42. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | ru | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 14; Issue 4 | - |
dc.subject | asubjectification | en_GB |
dc.subject | saying | en_GB |
dc.subject | imperative sentence | en_GB |
dc.subject | discourse | en_GB |
dc.subject | sermon | en_GB |
dc.subject | speaking subject of an utterance | en_GB |
dc.subject | preconstruct | en_GB |
dc.subject | illocutionary meaning | en_GB |
dc.subject | reference | en_GB |
dc.title | The Problem of Subjectivity in a Discourse in Terms of Imperative Sentences | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 4 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
06-Burtsev.pdf | 714,72 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.