Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/8908
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorYanchenko, Denis G.-
dc.contributor.authorShorokhov, Vladimir A.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-23T15:22:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-23T15:22:05Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-
dc.identifier.citationYanchenko D. G., Shorokhov V. A. The caucasian policy of the imperial branches of power during the first Russian revolution. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2017, vol. 62, issue 4, pp. 674–692.en_GB
dc.identifier.other10.21638/11701/spbu02.2017.402-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/8908-
dc.description.abstractThe paper examines the main policies of the imperial government, the tzar’s namestnik (lord viceroy) and the State Duma concerning the Caucasus question between 1905 and 1907. All the measures to combat regional nationalism and terrorism are investigated amid the general policy of de-escalation of tensions and the remedial actions taken in the wake of revolutionary turmoil. The authors investigate the course by the namestnik H. I. Vorontsov-Dashkov who put together all possible reforms and security measures to good advantage. The namestnik’s independent policy led to multiple conflicts with bureaucrats as well as with the State Duma. A personal factor is also worth taking into account — H. I. Vorontsov-Dashkov had awkward dealings with some members of the government, especially P. A. Stolypin. The authors conclude that local elites of the region tried to gain maximum concessions from the government in the shortest time possible through demonstrating explicit support of revolutionary circles. At the same time, the imperial administration’s overriding demand for the restoration to minimally safe conditions was more or less ignored. Having chosen the language of slogans and massive pressure on the Tsarist administration, the Caucasian deputies of the State Duma abrogated the possibility of satisfying their voters’ expectations and fulfilled the roles of background players in settling regional conflicts. In conclusion, the viceroyalty was the most effective institution in the revolutionary context though it remained a provisional and emergency structure. Only H. I. Vorontsov-Dashkov had enough prerogative and subtle understanding of the situation and, finally, it was he as namestnik who took it upon himself to introduce real measures to settle national differences in the region and to advocate for the rights of the Caucasian communities in the face of the Centre. Refs 54.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the grant of the President of the Russian Federation for the young PhDs no. МК-630.2017.6 “The Council of Ministers, the Duma and the policy concerning the periphery of the Russian Empire in 1906–1917ˮ.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 62; Issue 4-
dc.subjectThe Russian Revolution of 1905–1907en_GB
dc.subjectthe Caucasusen_GB
dc.subjectthe viceroyaltyen_GB
dc.subjectthe State Dumaen_GB
dc.subjectnationalismsen_GB
dc.subjectthe imperial governanceen_GB
dc.titleThe caucasian policy of the imperial branches of power during the first Russian revolutionen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 4

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
02-Yanchenko.pdf690,73 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.