Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/6360
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorSablin, Ivan-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-18T12:48:35Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-18T12:48:35Z-
dc.date.issued2017-03-
dc.identifier.citationSablin I. V. Nationalist mobilization in the russian far east during the closing phase of the civil war. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2017, vol. 62, issue 1, pp. 18–25.en_GB
dc.identifier.other10.21638/11701/spbu02.2017.102-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/6360-
dc.description.abstractThree major factions in the Russian Civil War in the Far East engaged in nationalist mobilization coming up with different rhetorical tropes and images in the 1920–1922 period. The ultra-royalist faction led by Mikhail Konstantinovich Diterikhs, which in 1922 controlled the Provisional Priamur Government in Vladivostok, portrayed the Romanovs as redeemers who had ended the “dark age” of the Time of Troubles (1598–1613) and called for a new Zemskii Sobor to elect a Romanov Tsar for the sake of new redemption from the “foreign” Bolsheviks. The socialist faction of the Far Eastern Republic (FER), taken over by the Bolsheviks, focused on the grievances caused by the Romanovs’ policies and the clashes with Japan and stressed the future role of the Russians as the first nation of toilers to lead the global struggle for social justice. The popular monarchist faction, established by Grigorii Mikhailovich Semenov, tried to find a middle ground by emphasising the popular role in ending the Time of Troubles and agitating for an elected muzhik Tsar. The ultra-royalist and monarchist rhetoric failed to mobilize the people of the Far East who did not identify with the Eurocentric images of the past and rebuked the cooperation between the monarchists and Japan. The socialist claims that the Romanovs and the Japanese accounted for the degraded present proved more relevant in view of the regional historical narrative featuring a series of conflicts with East Asian states, while the economic rather than racial interpretation of the Japanese policies and the inclusive character of socialism did not alienate ethnic minorities from the socialist faction. Refs 22.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE), project “Transformation of Regimes of Governing Diversity: Continuity of Imperial Practices and Ruptures of Post-imperial Political Imaginaries in the History of Russia” (TZ-51) in 2017, and supported within the framework of a subsidy granted to the HSE by the Government of the Russian Federation for the implementation of the Global Competitiveness Program.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Vol. 62; Issue 1-
dc.subjectRussian Civil Waren_GB
dc.subjectnationalismen_GB
dc.subjectRussian Far Easten_GB
dc.subjectsocialismen_GB
dc.subjectmonarchismen_GB
dc.titleNationalist mobilization in the russian far east during the closing phase of the civil waren_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
02-Sablin.pdf610,69 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.