Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/5984
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorBirkin, Frank K.-
dc.contributor.authorCam, Olga-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T09:24:10Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-30T09:24:10Z-
dc.date.issued2016-12-
dc.identifier.citationBirkin F. K., Cam O. Accounting for Sustainability: Episteme Change and Ontological Plurality. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, 2016, issue 4, pp. 104–123.en_GB
dc.identifier.other10.21638/11701/spbu05.2016.406-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/5984-
dc.description.abstractRecent research reveals accounting for sustainable development to be both problematic and essential. This paper considers that the problems arising may be intrinsic to the concepts and structures of Modern accounting and that their resolution lies ultimately in the development of the consequences of a new possibility of knowledge or episteme. After a brief presentation of the nature and historic impacts of episteme change, this paper explores the epistemic origins of Modern accounting. Evidence for a new, other than Modern, episteme is then presented and its consequences for accounting for sustainable accounting are explored. Significant evidence in this regard is the work of Bruno Latour from Actor-Network Theory to the plurality of ontologies. Refs 93.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSt Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies;Issue 4-
dc.subjectsustainability accountingen_GB
dc.subjectepistemeen_GB
dc.subjectontologyen_GB
dc.subjectmodernityen_GB
dc.titleAccounting for Sustainability: Episteme Change and Ontological Pluralityen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 4

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
06-Birkin.pdf200,19 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.