Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/5765
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Glotova, Svetlana V. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-09T12:43:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-12-09T12:43:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Glotova S. V. The Totion of “Сrimes against Humanity”: the General Recognition and Contextual Elements in Modern International Law. Vestnik SPbSU. Ser. 14. Law, 2016, issue 3, pp. 36–49. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | 10.21638/11701/spbu14.2016.304 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/5765 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The concept the crimes against humanity (CaH) is generally recognized in international law. This is due to, among other things, the inclusion of СaH in the statutes of international criminal tribunals and the International Criminal Court (ICC). The Rome Statute of the ICC (Art. 7) contains the definition of it which fully reflects the customary international law. Confi rmation of general acceptance of the criminal nature of the CaH was given by the International Law Commission on the topic “Crimes against humanity”. Adoption of (provisionally) the Commission’s defi nition of CaH, the identical Art. 7 of the Rome Statute (RS), should be evaluated as a confi rmation of the general recognition within the meaning of the notion CaH, as expressed in the RS, with regard to both individual offenses and the contextual elements. General obligations and requirements for States to punish, prevent and cooperate in the investigation and persecution of CaH describe, inter alia, the erga omnes nature of their prohibition, according to the Draft . Based on the analysis of recent court practice, the author comes to the following conclusions. Among the contextual elements of CaH “direction against the civilian population” should be interpreted as actions related to the context of organized violence (not necessarily military), as well as ill-treatment. The “civilians” as categories are not completely identical to that in the IHL. CaH are crimes under international law, regardless of whether they have been committed in the time of armed conflict or not. Widespread attack is associated with mass victimization. The systematic attack is an alternative criterion. The criterion of ‘having a plan and policies of the state and the organization’, has no independent value, but may prove an organized and systematic nature of the acts. Refs 21. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | ru | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Series 14. Law;Issue 3 | - |
dc.subject | crimes against humanity | en_GB |
dc.subject | civilians | en_GB |
dc.subject | International Military Tribunal | en_GB |
dc.subject | International Law Commission | en_GB |
dc.subject | Rome Statute of International Criminal Court | en_GB |
dc.subject | erga omnes | en_GB |
dc.title | The Totion of “Сrimes against Humanity”: the General Recognition and Contextual Elements in Modern International Law | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 3 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
04-Glotova.pdf | 154,26 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.