Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/45100
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorYasinskaya-Kazachenko, Angelika V.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-19T09:12:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-19T09:12:34Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationYasinskaya-Kazachenko, Angelika V. 2024. “Implementation of the constitutional right of workers to collective labor disputes at the level of ‘the right to strike’.” Russian Journal of Labour & Law 14: 187–205. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2024.111 (In Russian)en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2024.111-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/45100-
dc.description.abstractThe article is devoted to the study of the specifics of the implementation of the constitutional right of workers to collective labor disputes at the level of “the right to strike”. The author considers: procedural, civil and public law principles of labor law in relation to the institution of “the right to strike”; reflexes of objective and subjective law based on a situational approach; limited “strike” legal capacity; delimitation of disputes so that there is no opposition of rights and interests, while a dispute about interest is only an integral part of a dispute about law; issues of creating a special permanent body, a strike fund; methodological features included in the definition of the concept of a strike; self-defense by employees of their economic and social interests; minimum required works (services); a historically recurring tendency to restrict or prohibit lockouts; and finally, a call is made for the identification of “compulsion to strike” requirements. The key points of the transformations are the legal assessment of the actual circumstances and their qualification. It is proposed to supplement and modify labor legislation with provisions on the release of parties to a collective labor dispute from liability for failure to fulfill their obligations due to a strike, along with the introduction of an additional legal liability. The phased introduction of conceptually well-thought-out changes and additions to labor legislation, filling in the gaps in terms of “reflection of law” and the settlement of disagreements is of relevance. At present, the positive experience accumulated by the world community in the area under study can be taken into account in the process of finalizing acts of labor legislation by supplementing them with provisions on non-traditional methods of organizing conciliation, mediation and arbitration procedures for resolving labor disputes, which most effectively contribute to the prevention of conflict situations.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRussian Journal of Labour & Law;Volume 14-
dc.subjectreflexes of lawen_GB
dc.subjectsubjective righten_GB
dc.subjectobjective lawen_GB
dc.subjectdelimitation of disputesen_GB
dc.subjectorganen_GB
dc.subjectself-defense rightsen_GB
dc.subjectminimum worken_GB
dc.subjectlockouten_GB
dc.subjectidentification of requirementsen_GB
dc.subjectcoercion to participateen_GB
dc.titleImplementation of the constitutional right of workers to collective labor disputes at the level of ‘the right to strike’en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 4

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
187-205.pdf716,63 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.