Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44541
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gershkovich, Valeria A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tikhonov, Roman V. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bystrova, Ekaterina E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lvova, Olga V. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-20T21:37:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-20T21:37:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-12 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Gershkovich V. A., Tikhonov R. V., Bystrova E. E., Lvova O. L. The influence of confabulations about the reasons for the choice on the formation of false memories. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2023, vol. 13, issue 4, pp. 566–585. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2023.409 (In Russian) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2023.409 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44541 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The article examines the causes of the choice blindness aftereffect on the formation of false memories. Several studies have shown that when individuals provide reasons for a choice they did not actually make, their memories shift towards the invented justifications (confabulations). The aim of this study is to contrast the explanation of the mnemonic aftereffect of choice blindness in terms of cognitive dissonance theory with explanations in terms of recency and verbalization effects. In the experiment, we compared two situations: one where participants justified evaluations contradicting their initial opinions, and another where they justified evaluations but attributed them to their partners’ opinions. It was hypothesized that if self-justification induces cognitive dissonance, participants who confabulated reasons for choices believed to be their own would exhibit more false memories regarding the original choice compared to those who believed they justified their partner’s opinion. The first stage involved participants evaluating the IQ of women based on their photos. In the second stage they had to explain the reasons for the evaluations (either considering it their own choice or partner’s). Half of the evaluations submitted for explanations contradicted the previously issued ones (low evaluations changed to high ones and vice versa). In the third stage, the participants had to remember the original evaluation. A change in the pole of perceived IQ judgments was measured. The results confirmed the presence of the choice blindness effect. The effect of false memories was found only in the group that considered the presented evaluations to be their own opinions. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 21-18-00429 “Cognitive mechanisms of multimodal information processing: text type & type of recipient”. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | ru | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Psychology;Volume 13; Issue 4 | - |
dc.subject | choice blindness | en_GB |
dc.subject | confabulations | en_GB |
dc.subject | misinformation | en_GB |
dc.subject | false memories | en_GB |
dc.subject | cognitive dissonance | en_GB |
dc.subject | recency effect | en_GB |
dc.subject | verbalization | en_GB |
dc.title | The influence of confabulations about the reasons for the choice on the formation of false memories | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Appears in Collections: | Issue 4 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.