Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/43772
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorYanchenko, D. G.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-17T18:25:43Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-17T18:25:43Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-
dc.identifier.citationYanchenko D. G. ‘The Amur Expedition and the Committee for the Settlement of the Far East in the Agenda of the Russian Council of Ministers under P. A. Stolypin’, Modern History of Russia, vol. 13, no. 1, 2023, pp. 56–75. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu24.2023.104 (In Russian)en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu24.2023.104-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/43772-
dc.description.abstractThe defeat in the Russo-Japanese War forced the Russian authorities to change their strategy: instead of territorial expansion, the main task was to settle the Russian-speaking population in the Russian Far East and to ensure the border area security. For this purpose, large infrastructure projects were financed from the state budget during the interwar period. One of the most famous was the Amur railroad, the construction of which, as in the case with the Trans-Siberian Railway, significantly accelerated the colonization of the vast but sparsely populated territories of the Amur Region. In official publications and government discussions, the role of the road was associated not only with the achievement of military and strategic goals, but also with the economic development of Siberia and the Far East as a whole. At the same time, the establishment of a coordinating center for Far Eastern colonization became urgent in view of a large-scale attempt to solve the agrarian question in Central Russia. Participation of the members of the unified Government — the Council of Ministers — in the development of these measures implied taking into account all inter-agency interests. At the end of 1908, the Chairman of the Council of Ministers could only formulate general wishes on the organization of theoretical (scientific work) and practical (resettlement) aspects in the Far East. These proposals did not consider the specifics of lawmaking in the Duma monarchy. Attempts of the Main Administration for Land Management and Agriculture headed by A. V. Krivoshein to monopolize the subject of resettlement encountered sharp opposition from the most influential part of the government. The decision taken in 1909 to establish the Committee on the settlement of the Far East and to organize the Amur expedition was a compromise which was not predetermined by P. A. Stolypin’s original plans.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research was prepared with the support of the Russian Science Foundation (RSF), project no. 22-28-01350 “Colonization of the Far East and Manchuria in Russian and Chinese Government Documents, Journalism and Periodicals, 1894–1920”.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesModern History of Russia;Volume 13; Issue 1-
dc.subjectFar Easten_GB
dc.subjectRussian Empireen_GB
dc.subjectAmur expeditionen_GB
dc.subjectCommittee for the Settlement of the Far Easten_GB
dc.subjectcolonizationen_GB
dc.subjectChinese Eastern Railwayen_GB
dc.subjectCouncil of Ministersen_GB
dc.titleThe Amur Expedition and the Committee for the Settlement of the Far East in the Agenda of the Russian Council of Ministers under P. A. Stolypinen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
04_yanchenko.pdf820,98 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.