Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/41603
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorVasilyev, Ilia A.-
dc.contributor.authorVetrova, Evgenia G.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-19T12:39:48Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-19T12:39:48Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-
dc.identifier.citationVasilyev, Ilia A., Evgenia G. Vetrova. 2023. “A new ‘catch 22’: ‘Protective measures’, ‘preventive measures’ and ‘sports sanctions’ versus Russian athletes”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 2: 510–520. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.214en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/41603-
dc.description.abstractAfter the announcement of a Russian special military operation, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) on February 28, 2022 offered its Recommendations to the Olympic Move ment (international sports federations and other global sports’ organizers) on the participa tion of subjects of Russian sports. The IOC recommended that Russian athletes should not be allowed to participate in international competitions unless Russian participants act as neutral athletes. Since that date, international sports federations have imposed and continue to impose multidirectional negative measures against Russian athletes. Despite the formally non-mandatory status of Recommendations, the federations have chosen Russian athletes’ suspension and not “neutral status”, with rare exceptions (and the nuances of the decisions): the International Judo Federation (IJF), the International Tennis Federation (ITF), the Inter national Automobile Federation (FIA), the International Cycling Union (ICU). Unfortunately, suspensions of Russian athletes have become a “routine” practice of global sports in 2022. The speed of making suspension-decisions identical to the IOC Recommendations raised a well-founded question about the existence of legal grounds for suspensions in the regulation of international federations. This research is focused on the types and content of “measures” (“protective”, “preventive”, “sports sanctions”) against Russian athletes, including the IOC pro posed “protective” doctrine. As a result, at least three main points were identified. First, the names “protective” and “preventive” are artificial, and all measures are identical in content. Second, at the time the measures were adopted, the statutes of the sports federations did not explicitly provide for either “protective measures” or “preventive measures”. Thirdly, the use of “sports sanctions” as “measures” is not based on the statutes and constitutions of international sports federations.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 14; Issue 2-
dc.subjectInternational Olympic Committeeen_GB
dc.subjectinternational sports federationsen_GB
dc.subjectprotective measuresen_GB
dc.subjectpreventive measuresen_GB
dc.subjectsports sanctionsen_GB
dc.subjectsuspensions of athletesen_GB
dc.subjectRussian athletesen_GB
dc.titleA new ‘catch 22’: ‘Protective measures’, ‘preventive measures’ and ‘sports sanctions’ versus Russian athletesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 2

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
14.pdf675,03 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.