Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/39156
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chernysheva, Vlada A. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-21T20:27:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-21T20:27:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-12 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Chernysheva V. A. Latin Impersonal Passive and the Category of Pluractionality. Philologia Classica 2022, 17 (2), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2022.208 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2022.208 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/39156 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article aims to put Latin impersonal passive into the context of covert categories, specifically pluractionality. I try to reanalyse six passages from the Roman grammatical texts, mostly compiled in Heinrich Keil’s Grammatici Latini, in which the meaning of Latin impersonal passives is considered. There are two groups of evidence. The first one (passages from Diomedes, Priscian, and frg. Bobiense de verbo) presents the impersonal passive as a linguistic strategy that shifts focus from an agent to a situation, while the second one (Diomedes and two excerpts of Servius’ commentaries on Virgil) concentrates upon the number of agents. In the last case, a verbal action is considered to be a collective one involving many people, and therefore, in my opinion, falls into the category of pluractionality. Being a diverse phenomenon, the term pluractionality includes participant plurality, which is realised either in a subject or in an object depending on whether the verb is intransitive or transitive. Intransitivity of the Latin impersonal passive forms, as it seems, may imply agent plurality rather than subject plurality, since impersonal passive constructions are subjectless. Furthermore, in my opinion, the evidence provided by Latin grammarians demonstrates a contraposition of the 1st person singular, 1st person plural and 3rd person singular passive forms. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work has been supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant, project No. 22–28–00531 “Grammar of covert categories in Latin and Ancient Greek”. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Philologia Classica;Volume 17; Issue 2 | - |
dc.subject | Latin | en_GB |
dc.subject | pluractionality | en_GB |
dc.subject | agent plurality | en_GB |
dc.subject | subject plurality | en_GB |
dc.subject | covert category | en_GB |
dc.subject | impersonal passive | en_GB |
dc.subject | Roman grammarians | en_GB |
dc.title | Latin Impersonal Passive and the Category of Pluractionality | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 2 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
15358-Текст статьи-51321-1-10-20230209.pdf | 653,06 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.