Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/39123
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorKuzmenko, Alexander V.-
dc.contributor.authorStartsev, Nicolay N.-
dc.contributor.authorFilippova, Marina V.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-14T19:48:51Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-14T19:48:51Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationKuzmenko, Alexander V., Startsev, Nicolay N., Filippova, Marina V. 2023. “Regulation of the work of remote workers: Analysis of judicial practice.” Russian Journal of Labour & Law 13: 202–222. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2023.114 (In Russian)en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2023.114-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/39123-
dc.description.abstractThe article is based on the materials of the monitoring of judicial practice. As part of the monitoring, judicial acts of cassation instances in the field of implementation of legislation on the labour of remote workers were analyzed. The problems that most often become the cause of disputes are identified. During the analysis of disputes on the recognition of an employment contract concluded by the parties as a contract on remote work, it was found that the courts attach decisive importance to the actual conditions of employment, rather than the formal consolidation of the relevant conditions in the text of the contract. The problem of assessing the legality of interaction between the parties to an employment contract is also significant, which is determined by the specifics of such interaction, which in most cases involves the active use of telecommunications, information systems, and appropriate technical means. The problem of distinguishing the performance of remote work under an employment contract from the performance of obligations under civil law contracts seems to be relevant. In such cases, there is a contradictory practice based on different interpretations and assessments of factual circumstances. The complexity of the problem in relation to remote work is further aggravated by the fact that the very nature of remote work “blurs” some stable criteria for distinguishing labour and civil contracts (employer authority, employer control, etc.). The authors come to the conclusion that the existing problems of the practice of applying the norms on remote work are mostly generated not by defects in the legislation itself, but are associated either with individual shortcomings of a specific law enforcement process, or with general problems of the theory of labour law. In this regard, it seems most appropriate to generalize law enforcement practice on this issue and consolidate it at the level of a review of judicial practice or a resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRussian Journal of Labour & Law;Volume 13-
dc.subjectremote workeren_GB
dc.subjectremote labouren_GB
dc.subjectremote worken_GB
dc.subjectremote worken_GB
dc.subjectremote employmenten_GB
dc.titleRegulation of the work of remote workers: Analysis of judicial practiceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Volume 13

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
202-222.pdf723,77 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.