Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/39051
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Vasileva, Irina E. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-07T19:00:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-07T19:00:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Vasileva I. E. Social imaginary of a literary technique: About dynamics of transitivity in Russian literature of the late 19th century (Dostoevsky, Garshin, Chekhov). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2022, 19 (3): 446–469. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2022.303 (In Russian) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2022.303 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/39051 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article discusses the problems we face while describing transition periods. I analyze various approaches to the phenomenon of transition and criteria used for their identification. I suggest that we should pay more attention to internal substance of transition process than the role of sociocultural factors or external features which reflect changes in literature. The problems are discussed using the texts by Dostoevsky, Garshin and Chekhov who represent in many respects transitional epoch of the late 19th century. Chronologically, their oeuvres belong to adjacent periods, and so it is possible to trace the changes as a process but not as a set of typological attributes. The comparative analysis is focused on the motive of response as the generalized literary technique, and differences in its use demonstrate transformations of various zones of the literary field — from author’s intention and reader’s reception to the techniques of the creation of narration. For all three Russian writers, the search of “new ways” and strategic decisions are connected with readers’ activity, although each of them understands it in his own way. Dostoevsky and Garshin believe that literature should recover social consensus, and the response plays the principal role here. For Chekhov, response ceased to be a goal. In his system, response is a constant critical defamiliarization of any point of view and gives way to a new type of social interaction. As a result, such features of transition as historical assessment and prognosis are fully expressed in Chekhov’s literary system. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | The study was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, project nо. 21-18-00527 in the Institute of Russian Literature (Pushkin House) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, https://rscf.ru/project/21-18-00527/. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | ru | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 19; Issue 3 | - |
dc.subject | transition periods | en_GB |
dc.subject | F. M. Dostoevsky | en_GB |
dc.subject | V. M. Garshin | en_GB |
dc.subject | A. P. Chekhov | en_GB |
dc.subject | social imaginary | en_GB |
dc.title | Social imaginary of a literary technique: About dynamics of transitivity in Russian literature of the late 19th century (Dostoevsky, Garshin, Chekhov) | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 3 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
14873-Текст статьи-49415-1-10-20221205.pdf | 714,66 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.