Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38978
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lepekhov, Sergey Yu. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-07T10:05:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-07T10:05:04Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-12 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Lepekhov S. Yu. The correlation of the concepts of Madhyamaka and Yogācāra in Nāgārjuna’s “Bodhicittavivarana”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2022, vol. 38, issue 4, pp. 631–649. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.416 (In Russian) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.416 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38978 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Nāgārjuna — the founder of Mahayana school Madhyamaka — is also a well-known logician, polemist and the author of several famous treatises, such as “Bodhicittavivarana” (“Commentary on Bodhicitta”). This commentary is one of the most cited in Indian philosophical literature, and, notwithstanding it’s dubious origin, belongs to the authorship of Nāgārjuna. The main feature of this text is the description of the concepts of Madhyamaka and Yogācāra, which elaborate each other and not differs. The basic concept of Madhyamaka — “çūnyatā” (“the emptiness”) is expanded through the other important category “bodhicitta” (“the attainment of Enlightenment”). The differences between the phenomenal truth (“samvrtti”) and the ignorance (“avidyā”), Nāgārjuna’s analysis of Sarvastivāda and Yogācāra as the schools, representing only the phenomenal truth and Yogācāra’s argumentation, substantiating the existence of the “only-consciousness” are analyzed on the base of “Bodhicittavivarana”. Nāgārjuna’s argument is considered, based on the impossibility of implication between permanent and non-permanent objects. It is shown that the “three natures” of Yogācāra, as Nāgārjuna proves, cannot be graded, as they have one nature — the nature of çūnyatā. This text using the methodology of Madhyamaka is an example of the most follow-up un-contradictory unification of the concepts of various Buddhist schools (as well as Yogācāra). The author’s translation of “Bodhicittavivarana” from Sanskrit and Tibetan is given in attachment. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | The research was carried out within the state assignment of FASO Russia (project no. AAAAA-A17-117021310267-5); (project no. 0179-2014-0022 “Patterns of historical development of the peoples of the East from ancient times to the middle of the 20th century”) “Written traditions of the peoples of the Baikal region in the context of the historical and cultural heritage of Russia and Inner Asia” no. 121031000263-3. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | ru | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 38; Issue 4 | - |
dc.subject | buddhism | en_GB |
dc.subject | sarvastivāda | en_GB |
dc.subject | madhyamaka | en_GB |
dc.subject | yogācāra | en_GB |
dc.subject | bodhicitta | en_GB |
dc.subject | Nāgārjuna | en_GB |
dc.subject | Bodhicittavivarana | en_GB |
dc.title | The correlation of the concepts of Madhyamaka and Yogācāra in Nāgārjuna’s “Bodhicittavivarana” | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 4 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
16.pdf | 713,11 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.