Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38770
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorWang, Guanglong-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-29T14:12:51Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-29T14:12:51Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-
dc.identifier.citationWang Guanglong. 2022. “Criminal law regulation of countering cybercrime in China: State, trends and shortcomings”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 3: 661–677. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.305 (In Russian)en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.305-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/38770-
dc.description.abstractIn modern China, cybercrime is becoming more widespread, which has given rise to the need to rethink criminal law at the basic theoretical level. It seems that when countering crimes in cyberspace, it is necessary to shift the focus of cyber-criminal law from the traditional “network-centric” to “data-oriented” and to build a system for the protecting legal benefits of “data centralism”. In addition, the expansion of the objective components of cybercrime should be moderate: certain cyber-violations cannot be qualified as “illegal entrepreneurship”, as this contradicts the principle of legality of criminal law. The content of “knowingness” as a sign of the subjective side of the crime should be rethought: it should include such different forms as: a) the presence of collusion with other persons to assist in the commission of criminal acts; b) lack of collusion between the person providing assistance and the perpetrator, but the previous one, knowing that a particular perpetrator he is going to commit a certain criminal act, provides online support and assistance to the latter; c) online help providers who only have a probable idea of the existence of criminal acts, but do not have a clear idea of the culprit and the type of behavior of criminal acts, and as such there can be no collusion with the perpetrator of criminal acts, only objectively assists the culprit’s act. The theoretical basis for identifying complicity in cybercrime should be adjusted by approving “one-sided” subjective connection. Ultimately, through systematic adjustment and rethinking of the basic theory of criminal law in this area, the gradual improvement of criminal law norms to regulate the fight against cybercrime in the era of information networks is being carried out.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article was prepared as part of the China Scholarship Council (CSC) (No. 202110100004).en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 13; Issue 3-
dc.subjectcyber criminal lawen_GB
dc.subjectcybercrimeen_GB
dc.subjectcyberspaceen_GB
dc.subjectcyberspaceen_GB
dc.subjectknowingnessen_GB
dc.subjectcomplicity in cybercrimeen_GB
dc.subjectone-sided accompliceen_GB
dc.titleCriminal law regulation of countering cybercrime in China: State, trends and shortcomingsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 3

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
05.pdf865,36 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.