Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38073
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorDmitrenko, Sergey Yu.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-03T14:43:07Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-03T14:43:07Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-
dc.identifier.citationDmitrenko S. Yu. Сausal Markers in Old Khmer. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 2022, vol. 14, issue 2, pp. 261–287. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2022.207 (In Russian)en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2022.207-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/38073-
dc.description.abstractThis paper considers causal markers in Old Khmer, the language of epigraphic 7th–15th century monuments found in Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, and Thailand. Consistently looking at the contexts of two lexemes, hetu and man, it ascertains that hetu (traceable to the Sanskrit noun “cause”) was used in the 10th–11th centuries as a specialized conjunction to introduce causal clauses. Modern Khmer has transformed hetu into the conjunction haet tae. Modern Khmer also widely uses haet in various consequence phrases (as against its merely sporadic occurrences in this meaning in Old Khmer). The conjunction man is another ancient causal marker, probably ascending to Old Javanese. In consistence with modern views on the emergence of causal markers, its causal function may have developed from its earlier temporal uses (“when”). Man is not found in Modern Khmer, having fallen out of use as early as in the Middle Khmer, the language of the 15th–18th century monuments. Our probe into causal constructions with hetu and man could not come up with any examples of Old Khmer constructions with dependent nominal causal phrases, while these are common in Modern Khmer, though evidently — as derivatives of dependent causal clauses. The paper also looks into the potential emergence paths for the modern causal markers prʊəh and daoj(-saː). Our conclusion is that the registered occurrences of the Old Khmer ancestors of these words (roḥ and toy, respectively) provide no definite clue as to their evolution or the exact period when they or their derivatives assumed the causal function. Nevertheless, the existence of their modern Thai (pʰrɔ́ʔ, dûay) and Lao (pʰɔ̄ʔ, dûay ) counterparts suggests that the Old Khmer also used the respective causal markers that were later borrowed by Tai languages.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was carried out within the framework of the Russian Science Foundation project No. 8-18- 00472 “Causal constructions in the languages of the world: semantics and typology”.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies;Volume 14; Issue 2-
dc.subjectKhmeren_GB
dc.subjectAncient Khmeren_GB
dc.subjectsyntaxen_GB
dc.subjectcausal constructionen_GB
dc.subjectcausal conjunctionen_GB
dc.subjectcausal clauseen_GB
dc.titleСausal Markers in Old Khmeren_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 2

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
14093-Текст статьи-46383-1-10-20220801.pdf917,27 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.