Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/34106
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yachmenik, Vyacheslav A. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-11T10:07:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-11T10:07:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Yachmenik V. A. The concept of sobornost’ and the problem of church authority in Russian theology late 19th — early 20th centuries. Issues of Theology, 2021, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 537–552. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2021.407 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/34106 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article is devoted to the problematization of the idea of сhurch authority in Russian theology at the turn of the epochs, which is considered on the basis of the emergence and development of the concept of sobornost’. The reconstruction of the polemical context of A. Khomyakov allows the interpretation of the texts of which the concept of sobornost’ is included in theological thought. It also makes it possible to connect the problem of the authority of hierarchy with the idea of sobornost’ of the Church. In addition to the “Khomyakovsky” context, the author refers to three other authors, considered in chronological order. First, this concerns a collection of articles by Fr. A. Ivantsov-Platonov, in which he interprets the idea of sobornost’ designating it as an ideal characteristic of church structure. Here sobornost’ is associated with conciliar rule, which was not directly suggested by Khomyakov’s concept, and becomes a marker of (un)canonicity. Secondly, the author turns to the spiritual-academic theology at the beginning of the century, in which “sobornost’” is developed at two levels — institutional and mystical. This attempt receives the greatest meaningful development in the texts of Metropolitan Archbishop Antony (Khrapovitsky), who substantiates the authority of the hierarchy through the development of “personalistic” sobornost’ and the idea of the pastoral “compassionate love” for parishioners. Thirdly, the author considers the documents of the 1917–1918 Local Council in the focus of the connection between sobornost’ and church authority. It is concluded that the inclusion of the idea of sobornost’ into the context of academic theology leads to the formulation of the idea of the hierarchy’s authority, which was expressed in the construction of a new image of patriarchal ministry at the Council. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | The article was prepared within the framework of the project “Russian Spiritual-Academic Theology of the Late 19th — Early 20th Centuries: Ideas and Contexts” with the support of St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University and the “Living Tradition” Foundation. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | ru | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Issues of Theology;Volume 3; Issue 4 | - |
dc.subject | Russian academic theology | en_GB |
dc.subject | ecclesiology | en_GB |
dc.subject | sobornost’ | en_GB |
dc.subject | ecclesiastical authority | en_GB |
dc.subject | patriarchy | en_GB |
dc.title | The concept of sobornost’ and the problem of church authority in Russian theology late 19th — early 20th centuries | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 4 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
08_Ячменик.pdf | 663,09 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.