Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33840
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorBortolotto, Chiara-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T20:28:34Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-10T20:28:34Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-
dc.identifier.citationBortolotto, Chiara. 2020. UNESCO, Intangible Cultural Heritage and the market: Controversies and stumbling blocks. Pravovedenie 64 (1): 80–92.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.107-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/33840-
dc.description.abstractThis article considers the relationship between Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) and the market in the backdrop of the reorientation of UNESCO’s priorities regarding sustainable development. Based on ethnographic observations of the meetings of the governing bodies of the Convention for the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage, this work analyses the controversies generated by “risks of over-commercialization” of ICH among actors with normative agency for designing “good” heritage governance. While the need to reconcile market and heritage is officially acknowledged, the inclusion of a particular commercial practice on the UNESCO ICH lists is qualified by many actors as “traumatic”. The debate spurred within the governing bodies of the Convention by the drafting of these documents sheds light on the controversial perception of the relationship between the market and ICH. In considering the idea of “commercialization without over-commercialization” suggested by actors to resolve the tension between heritage and market, this work highlights a constitutive ambiguity of the Convention. Based on the ideas of “misappropriation” and “decontextualization”, this concept is part of the logic of intellectual property. The Convention, however, was explicitly designed within an alternative paradigm emphasizing cultural dynamisms and shared belonging. While heritage entrepreneurs on the ground shift from one regime to the other making a pragmatic and strategic use of legal frameworks based on fundamentally different logics, this inconsistency generates normative conundrums among the actors involved with the official bodies of the Convention, torn between a proprietary and a heritage regime and their different moral economies. In the framework of the Convention, the principle of “commercialization without over-commercialization” embodies therefore a fragile compromise reflecting the tension between different regimes regulating traditional culture.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research for this paper was funded by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche trough the project “UNESCO frictions: heritage making across global governance” No. ANR-14-ACHN-0006-01.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPravovedenie;Volume 64; Issue 1-
dc.subjectUNESCOen_GB
dc.subjectConvention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritageen_GB
dc.subjectcommercializationen_GB
dc.subjectmoral economiesen_GB
dc.subjectheritage regimesen_GB
dc.subjectmarketen_GB
dc.subjectsustainable developmenten_GB
dc.titleUNESCO, Intangible Cultural Heritage and the market: Controversies and stumbling blocksen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
80-92.pdf665,52 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.