Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33754
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kaczyńska, Elwira | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-03T16:49:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-03T16:49:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-03 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Kaczyńska E. Considerations on Two Сruces Philologorum (Ael. NA 15, 25). Philologia Classica 2021, 16 (1), 32–39. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2021.103 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33754 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The present article aims to elucidate an interesting narrative that forms a portion of Aelian’s paradoxographic work Περὶ ζῴων ἰδιότητος (On the Characteristics of Animals, Lat. De natura animalium). The passage under discussion describes some horned animals of oriental origin that were involved in the annual fighting contests during a one-day competition held on the initiative of a “great king of India” — probably Chandragupta (4th–3rd c. BC), the founder of the Maurya dynasty. Aelian’s chapter (NA 15, 15) was perhaps taken from Megasthenes’s Ἰνδικά (Description of India). The passage includes two hapax legomena referring to two species of animals: †μέσοι† and †ὕαιναι†. The first of these should be identified with the Ladakh urial (Ovis orientalis vignei Blyth); cf. Prasun məṣé ‘ram, urial’ (< Vedic mēṣá- m. ‘ram’). Aelian’s exact description of the horned animals called †ὕαιναι† clearly demonstrates that the alleged “striped hyena” (Gk. ὕαινα) must represent the chinkara, i. e., the Indian gazelle (Gazella bennettii Sykes). The Indo-Aryan term for ‘chinkara’ (Ved. hariṇá- m ‘Indian gazelle’, hariṇī́- f. ‘female gazelle’; cf. Pa. and Pk. hariṇa- m., hariṇī- f.) suggests that the corrupted form in Aelian’s passage should be emended as ὑάριναι [hyárinai]. This seems a near-optimal adaptation of the Pali or Prakrit appellative háriṇā pl. ‘chinkaras’. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | The present article is part of the research project entitled Greek-Oriental contacts in a comparative perspective, financed by the scholarly development fund of the Faculty of Philology, University of Lodz. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Philologia Classica;Volume 16; Issue 1 | - |
dc.subject | animal terminology | en_GB |
dc.subject | borrowings | en_GB |
dc.subject | etymology | en_GB |
dc.subject | Greek scientific literature | en_GB |
dc.subject | Greek vocabulary | en_GB |
dc.subject | hapax legomena | en_GB |
dc.subject | language contact | en_GB |
dc.subject | Middle Indo-Aryan languages | en_GB |
dc.title | Considerations on Two Сruces Philologorum (Ael. NA 15, 25) | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 1 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
32-39.pdf | 759,16 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.