Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33424
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorMorozova, Olga M.-
dc.contributor.authorTroshina, Tatyana I.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T17:52:36Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T17:52:36Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-
dc.identifier.citationMorozova O. M., Troshina T. I. Bodies of Transitional Power at the Final Stage of the Civil War. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2021, vol. 66, issue 3, рp. 771–796.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2021.306-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/33424-
dc.description.abstractThe article is grounded on the research based on a large set of documents stored in the central and regional archives of the Russian Federation and neighboring countries. The authors have formulated a research question concerning identification of the common features in the process of restoration of the Soviet power on the outskirts of the country during the last stage of the Civil War. The article draws on the material spanning a short period between the retreat of the whites (in the territory of Arkhangelsk province, the Don and Tersk regions, Kuban, Dagestan) and liquidation of governing bodies of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic and entrance of the Red Army units. If before January-February 1920, the “whites” retreated with battles, then a preventive retreat ensued, and a regime of interstate power was established in the territory they left behind. The article reveals two scenarios on the eve of the reunification of the peripheral territories with the central Bolshevik power. It was quite rare that the area was abandoned without power and order. Usually, the consolidated democratic society either intercepted power from the weakened hands of the white administration or took over the reins of power from the command of the withdrawing White army in an organized manner. Temporary transitional authorities usually included representatives of socialist parties, non-partisan public, and trade unions. But in practice, this process had a distinct regional specificity influenced by the local palette of political forces, in the configuration that had developed before the Civil War. This phenomenon was very poorly reflected in the synchronous historical sources, so along with such miraculously preserved separate documents, personal evidence collected during the early Soviet memorial campaigns formed the basis for the study.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe reported study was funded by a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (science project number 19-09-00115 “The Socio-political dialogue in post-February and post-October Russia (1917–1918): the trends, the mechanism and the regional features”, Project Manager — Razinkov Mikhail).en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 66; Issue 3-
dc.subjectInterim Committeesen_GB
dc.subject1920en_GB
dc.subjectmulti-party systemen_GB
dc.subjectArkhangelsk provinceen_GB
dc.subjectDon regionen_GB
dc.subjectKuban regionen_GB
dc.subjectTersk regionen_GB
dc.subjectEastern Transcaucasiaen_GB
dc.titleBodies of Transitional Power at the Final Stage of the Civil Waren_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 3

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
771-796.pdf747,34 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.