Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/32992
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorRaevskaya, Natalya Yu.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-27T10:25:56Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-27T10:25:56Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier.citationRaevskaya N. Yu. Program aniconism in theology of Devarim (Deuteronomy). Issues of Theology, 2021, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 146–158.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2021.202-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/32992-
dc.description.abstractThe article explores the formation of the aniconic position in ancient Judaism. A reference to biblical texts shows that the aniconic doctrine, which put forward the demand for a cult without an image was formulated and theologically substantiated in the book of Devarim. Here, the prohibition on creating images follows YHWH’s statement of formlessness and is seen as its logical consequence. The invisible God cannot be adequately embodied in a visual material image and does not need it, because he has a different way of interacting with his people. Deities of other nations manifest themselves in temple statues, providing their worshipers the opportunity to approach them through a cult, but the God of the Jews, in accordance with the Devarim doctrine, chose a different way of communicating with people. He does not need statues, he remains with the people mainly not because of the correctness of the ritual, but because of the carefully executed law (only a small part of which is the ritual). In fact, in Devarim the scheme is reversed compared to the usual view of things at that time. The creation of images and worship of them does not bring the deity closer to people, but on the contrary threatens him with a distance. Comparison with the statements regarding the images in the book of Shemot (Exodus) suggests the following: a consistent aniconic program corresponding to clearly articulated monotheism and a specific cult paradigm was first announced in Devarim, and began to be established in the Jewish environment, probably not earlier than the end of VII c. BC. The religion of the ancient Jews was not static, strict aniconism was not inherent in Judaism initially, but it took shape and developed over many centuries.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIssues of Theology;Volume 3; Issue 2-
dc.subjectJudaismen_GB
dc.subjectaniconismen_GB
dc.subjectmonotheismen_GB
dc.subjectJewish arten_GB
dc.subjectJudaism and arten_GB
dc.subjectart and religionen_GB
dc.subjectprohibition of imagesen_GB
dc.subjectsecond commandmenten_GB
dc.subjectDeuteronomyen_GB
dc.subjectJewish culten_GB
dc.titleProgram aniconism in theology of Devarim (Deuteronomy)en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 2

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
146-158.pdf637,15 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.