Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/28081
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorGershkovich, Valeria A.-
dc.contributor.authorMoroshkina, Nadezhda V.-
dc.contributor.authorFedosova, Victoria I.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T19:32:02Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-20T19:32:02Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.citationGershkovich V. A., Moroshkina N. V., Fedosova V. I. Memory for the solutions sources in remote associate tasks: The role of generation effect and Aha!-experience. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2021, vol. 11, issue 1, pp. 72–88.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2021.105-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/28081-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the current work is to study the role of the Aha!-experience in remembering the source of solutions, either self-generated or externally presented. In memory studies there are specific source-monitoring errors, which occur whenever a participant claims to have generated an idea that was derived from different sources (unconscious plagiarism). Several previous studies have shown that experiencing the feeling of Aha! during either problem-solving or the presentation of the correct solutions can have a beneficial relationship to the subsequent recall of the material with the processing of which it was associated. However, studies of the Aha!-experience on the source monitoring task (self-generated solutions vs presented solutions) have not been conducted. In the authors’ study, the hypothesis that the feeling of Aha!, associated with the task being solved, can affect source-monitoring accuracy. During the first stage of the experiment, participants (80 people) had to solve Compound Remote Associates Task items and to estimate whether they had a feeling of Aha!, when either generating the solution or being presented with it in case they failed to generate it. At the second stage, conducted a week later, participants had to recall if the solution was generated by themselves or just presented. The results confirm the generation effect, which manifests itself in successfully recalling problems for which a solution was found (sufficient generation) compared to problems with no-solutions found (fail-to-generate). Participants quite accurately recognized the source of the solution a week later, attributing generated solutions to themselves, while attributing fail-to-generate solutions to the presented ones. However, the authors did not find any additional impact of the Aha!-experience on the problem’s recognition, nor on the sourcemonitoring task performance. In the conclusion of the article, the contradictions of different experimental data concerning the influence of the Aha!-experience on long-term memory and further areas of research is discussed.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was supported by the RFBR grant, project no. 20-013-00532.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. Psychology;Volume 11; Issue 1-
dc.subjectsource-monitoring judgementsen_GB
dc.subjectAha!-experienceen_GB
dc.subjectinsighten_GB
dc.subjectproblem-solvingen_GB
dc.subjectremote associate tasken_GB
dc.titleMemory for the solutions sources in remote associate tasks: The role of generation effect and Aha!-experienceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
72-88.pdf826,01 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.