Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/27914
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Alexander Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-16T10:57:03Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-16T10:57:03Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.citationMartin A. M. Debates on the Peasant Question in the Nikolaevan Era. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2021, vol. 66, issue 1, рp. 293–301.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2021.118-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/27914-
dc.description.abstractA large scholarly literature exists about plans for a peasant reform in the reign of Nicholas I. However, the most important archival documents about the debates on the peasant question remain unpublished. The new book by T. V. Andreeva “The distant approaches to the Great Reform: The peasant question in Russia in the reign of Nicholas I” seeks to fill this lacuna. The book begins with a historical survey of the six government committees that were tasked with planning reforms, followed by an extensive collection of archival documents of both official and private provenance. In the debates under Nicholas I, the specific problem of serfdom was folded into the larger question of the social position of the peasants, which the government regarded as a source of both political instability and economic backwardness. The solution that officials envisioned was a reform that was comprehensive, multi-faceted, and gradual. Step-by-step, the evolution that had led to creation of serfdom from the 17th century onward was to be reversed: the landlords were gradually to lose their power over the person of the serfs, who were to be attached only to the land itself. Eventually, the serfs were to be emancipated with land; in the meantime, restrictions on the power of landlords and a comprehensive reform of the state peasants were to serve as preparatory steps. According to Andreeva, the vision of Nicholas and his advisors was too limited and conservative, and premised on the mistaken belief that it was possible to modernize the country without touching the core of the sociopolitical system.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 66; Issue 1-
dc.subjectserfdomen_GB
dc.subjectstate peasantsen_GB
dc.subjectpeasant questionen_GB
dc.subjectsecret committeesen_GB
dc.subjectNicholas Ien_GB
dc.subjectGreat Reformsen_GB
dc.subjectP. D. Kiseleven_GB
dc.titleDebates on the Peasant Question in the Nikolaevan Eraen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
293-301.pdf660,22 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.