Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/27897
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorAndreev, Artem A.-
dc.contributor.authorKopaneva, Dina D.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-16T08:56:20Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-16T08:56:20Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.citationAndreev A. A., Kopaneva D. D. Paradoxes and Realities of the Iranian Politics of the First Romanovs. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2021, vol. 66, issue 1, рp. 5–18.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2021.101-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/27897-
dc.description.abstractThe paper based on materials from Fonds 77 “Relations between Russia and Persia” of the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts describes numerous episodes related to robberies and other conflicts between Russian and Iranian subjects in the context of the common amiable policy of their monarchs. Almost every letter from Shah Safi I (1629–1642) which was addressed to Mikhail Fedorovich contained assurances of a friendly attitude (“loving friendship”). The strategic line chosen by the two monarchs aimed at preserving and developing trade contacts between the two states was noticeably limited to tactical actions for the personal benefit of Russian and, to a larger extent, Iranian officials, representatives of the regional administration. The uprisings on the periphery of the Safavid state, in particular in Gilan, were accompanied by numerous cases of robbery of the tsar’s subjects. The Cossack raids, which intensified in the Caspian in view of Moscow’s ban on “going” to the Black Sea coast in the early 1630s, were already one of the main obstacles to Iranian trade. At the same time, the example of the embassy of the merchant (in Russian — kupchina, tsar’s or shah’s trade representative) Khvaji Rakhmat (1630–1631), the attempts of the Astrakhan governors to stop the robberies of the Cossacks on the Caspian coast, as well as the actions of the Shah to compensate for the property robbed in Lakhidjan, demonstrate that the two sides intended to maintain the “loving friendship”, albeit with varying degrees of success.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was supported by the research grant No. 18-78-10052 “The Documentary History of the Russian Strand of Safavid Diplomacy (1501–1722)” of the Russian Scienсe Foundation.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 66; Issue 1-
dc.subjectRussian-Iranian relations of the 17th centuryen_GB
dc.subjectMikhail Fedorovichen_GB
dc.subjectSafi Ien_GB
dc.subjectkupchinaen_GB
dc.subjectA. I. Romanchukoven_GB
dc.subjectShemakhaen_GB
dc.subjectGilanen_GB
dc.subjectCossacksen_GB
dc.titleParadoxes and Realities of the Iranian Politics of the First Romanovsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
5-18.pdf733,05 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.