Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/21128
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorVdovina, Galina V.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-01T12:24:58Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-01T12:24:58Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-
dc.identifier.citationVdovina G.V. Hervaeus Natalis and his polemics with the early scotists about formalities and formal distinction in God. Issues of Theology, 2020, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 409– 418.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttp://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2020.302-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/21128-
dc.description.abstractThe article is devoted to Hervaeus Natalis, also known as Hervaeus drom Nedellec, who was an outstanding theologian at the end of 13th — beginning of 14th centuries (c. 1260–1323). Brief biographical information about Hervaeus is provided and his importance for medieval thought is emphasized. The subject matter of the article is the consideration of a formal difference, or formal distinction in God. The introduction of this concept is usually associated with the name of Duns Scotus, and there is every reason for this: although Duns was not the inventor of formal distinction as such, it was he who put it at the heart of his trinitarian theology. The concept of formal difference is inextricably linked to the concept of formalities, which in this context mean those ontological subunits in a concrete single essence between which there is a formal difference. The basic impetus to the introduction of both concepts was the necessity for rational expression of distinction between common divine nature and those relations by which Persons are constituted (relations of fatherhood, sonship, etc.), and also between different divine attributes. The task was, on the one hand, not to destroy the absolute real unity in God, and, on the other hand, to explain certain differences that exist in him before any act of intellect, even divine intellect. Therefore, the notion of formality as a correlate “from the nature of the thing”, which corresponds to any attribute or relation, is conceivable in a separate concept.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe article was written with the support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 20-011-00439: “Concept and reality. Theological foundations of medieval ontology.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIssues of Theology;Volume 2; Issue 3-
dc.subjectHervaeus Natalisen_GB
dc.subjectscholasticismen_GB
dc.subjecttrinitarian theologyen_GB
dc.subjectformalityen_GB
dc.subjectformal distinctionen_GB
dc.subjectunity and identityen_GB
dc.subjectdivine simplicityen_GB
dc.titleHervaeus Natalis and his polemics with the early scotists about formalities and formal distinction in Goden_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 3

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
409-418.pdf717,46 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.