Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/20409
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Khudaykulova, Alexandra V. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-10T15:32:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-10T15:32:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Khudaykulova A.V. Explaining the security of the global South: Western and Non-Western approaches. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2020, vol. 13, issue 3, pp. 394–417. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2020.307 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/20409 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Dominant security theories, being mostly Western by their origin, are concentrated on the Western experience and security models, with minimal attempts to analyze the postcolonial security landscape of the global “South” which heavily affects the security agenda. The predominant part of modern conflicts (with some exceptions) take place precisely in the developing countries of the global South Western and non-Western approaches to security are distinguished by an expanded (comprehensive) understanding, but in both cases the emphasis is different. Various readings of security create a conflict of perception and, according to many non-Western experts, reflect the Western strategy to initiate a new colonization. At the same time, neither Western understanding nor alternative non-Western critical security theories can claim to be universal. The article describes the dynamics of theoretical approaches to the conceptualization of security, mainly in the context of the dominant Western school of International Relations, demonstrates and explains the marginality of non-Western security issues, and provides an overview of key security issues and threats to the developing world. In addition, relatively new Western concepts of security (humanitarian intervention, human security, responsibility to protect) are being analyzed, which cause strong opposition from the entire developing world and are perceived by non-Western societies as a direct threat. The weakness of the “postcolonial” states, their apparent inability to cope with internal development problems and disorders, and to ensure the safety of the population within their borders, serve as a reason for becoming an object of political influence and interference. At the same time, the West and the non-West are making efforts to speak the same political language of security because of the indivisibility of the current threats. However, the Western practice of world regulation is rejected by the developing world, especially by rising powers. Considering the weight and significance of “the rest of humanity” in such conditions, it is difficult to hope for a rational dialogue on global issues if the discourse, interests, and ambitions of the two poles differ considerably. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | The research was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the ANO EISI within the framework of the scientific project no. 19-011-31389 “Traditional and Rising Power Centers: Discussions about Sovereignty and Conflict Management”. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | ru | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vestnik of St Petersburg University. International Relations;Volume 13; Issue 3 | - |
dc.subject | international security | en_GB |
dc.subject | West | en_GB |
dc.subject | global South | en_GB |
dc.subject | realism | en_GB |
dc.subject | liberalism | en_GB |
dc.subject | constructivism | en_GB |
dc.subject | neoMarxism | en_GB |
dc.subject | security threats | en_GB |
dc.subject | conflicts | en_GB |
dc.subject | development | en_GB |
dc.subject | world order | en_GB |
dc.subject | securitization | en_GB |
dc.subject | personal security | en_GB |
dc.subject | “security-development” nexus | en_GB |
dc.subject | critical theories | en_GB |
dc.subject | postcolonialism | en_GB |
dc.title | Explaining the security of the global South: Western and Non-Western approaches | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 3 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
394-417.pdf | 711,15 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.