Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/19439
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Basalaeva, Irina Petrovna | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dubman, Eduard Leybovich | - |
dc.contributor.author | Khodarkovsky, Michael | - |
dc.contributor.author | Milchev, Vladimir Ivanovich | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mizis, Yuriy Aleksandrovich | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sen’, Dmitriy Vladimirovich | - |
dc.contributor.author | Urushadze, Amiran Tarielovich | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-11T12:50:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-11T12:50:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-03 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | How to study frontiers today? Discussion on the article by D. V. Sen’. Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana, 2020, vol. 1 (27), pp. 81–105. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu19.2020.105 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/19439 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The discussion was devoted to the consideration of the paper, written by D.V. Sen’, about the current situation in frontier researches in Russia, which was published in the current issue of the journal. The participants of the discussion were scholars from Russia, the United States and Ukraine, who are studing the history of border territories and border communities. They focused on several key problems related to the main topic of discussion. These are the questions: 1. Is the frontier concept convincing today? What are its strong and weak aspects? 2. Is the concept of a frontier effective for studying all countries, or only some? To study the history of which countries it is useful and in which it does not work? Why do you have such a point of view? 3. Why are continued new attempts to find alternative theories of the frontier theory? 4. What perspectives have comparative studies of the frontier, which compare the history of the frontier of different countries? 5. Is it possible to apply the concept of frontier to the history of Russia? To study the history of which Russian regions is it effective? What “Russian frontier” looks as a myth? Some participants consider the frontier model “politically insecure”. Other participants considered this idea to be irrelevant. However, there is no reason to consider be untenable the concept of a frontier unproductive on the fields that have analogies between the American frontier and other frontiers. Various points of view were considered about the validity of the frontier theory in relation to different cases, examples of explaining these events in the context of the history of different states, territories, cultures using the concept of a frontier. The question was discussed whether the theory of the frontier can provide at the beginning of the XXI century fundamental influence on the study of the history of Russian regions. The question was asked: why in various national historiographies the debate about the search for analogies or even about the revision of the theory of the frontier does not stop? The participants in the discussion generally agreed with the opinion that the concept of the frontier can be recognized as a convincing explanatory model when referring specifically to the Russian historical experience of the development of new territories in the 16th-19th centuries. The participants of the discussion identified the problems and prospects for the further use of the concept of the frontier, not insisting on its “classical definition” and recognizing the absence of a single (internally homogeneous and consistent) concept of the frontier. An opinion was also expressed about the need to identify the main cases of the transformation of the frontier territory into the traditional territory of the country. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | This discussion was created with the support of the program for the development of scientific journals under state contract No. 14.597.11.0035 concluded between the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation and NEICON | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | ru | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana;Volume 1 (27) | - |
dc.subject | historiography | en_GB |
dc.subject | colonization | en_GB |
dc.subject | borderlands | en_GB |
dc.subject | comparative studies | en_GB |
dc.subject | contact zones | en_GB |
dc.subject | borders | en_GB |
dc.subject | frontier | en_GB |
dc.subject | frontier theory | en_GB |
dc.subject | frontier studies | en_GB |
dc.title | How to study frontiers today? Discussion on the article by D. V. Sen’ | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 1 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
81-105.pdf | 734,75 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.