Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/18626
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorKanecki, Oskar-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-09T20:57:34Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-09T20:57:34Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-
dc.identifier.citationKanecki, Oskar. 2020. “The courts of the times of interregnum of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 2: 508–528.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.216-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/18626-
dc.description.abstractAfter the death of the last male representative of the Jagiellonian house, Sigismund II Augustus (Polish: Zygmunt August), most of the courts of nobility acting on behalf of the monarch suspended their activities. The nobility fulfilled the resulting deficiency by establishing confederations (called the hoods) in counties and provinces, which became the basis for deputies subsequently elected to the courts during the times of interregnum. They were functioning in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the years 1572–1764. They consisted of former court officials and representatives of the nobility and they were mostly housed in castles. The legal basis for the issued verdicts was the general applicable law. The subject-matter jurisdiction of the courts of the times of interregnum mainly involved criminal and fiscal matters, and the deprivation of possessions. They also judged the nobility, as well as the clergy, Jews, peasants and even townspeople and soldiers. Their activities were accompanied by relatively numerous incidents. In spite of this, courts of the times of interregnum quickened the process of executing justice in the times of interregnum. The shorter time of proceedings and structure contributed to this. Introducing procedural improvements were of special importance for a sovereign deprived of his state. The ineffectiveness of courts during the time of remarkably increased delinquency would undoubtedly lead to anarchy. Torture was used in the proceedings held before kangaroo courts. Commencing from 1632, the disputes arising during the election session for the Sejm were settled by a general court of the times of interregnum consisting of marshals, 3 senators and 12 representatives of Małopolska, Wielkopolska and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Its tasks involved mainly judging the crimes committed by the nobility, which had arrived in Warsaw for the royal elections. The general court of the times of interregnum made judgments most often in the Warsaw castle.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 11; Issue 2-
dc.subjectthe Grand Duchy of Lithuaniaen_GB
dc.subjectcouncil of nobilityen_GB
dc.subjectsejmiken_GB
dc.subjectresolution of the council of nobilityen_GB
dc.subjectthe courts in the times of interregnumen_GB
dc.subjectthe convocation Sejmen_GB
dc.subjectthe election Sejmen_GB
dc.subjectinterregnumen_GB
dc.subjectthe general court of the times of interregnumen_GB
dc.titleThe courts of the times of interregnum of the Grand Duchy of Lithuaniaen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 2

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
508-528.pdf694,97 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.