Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17966
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorMaslov, Andrey V.-
dc.contributor.authorGareev, Emir Z.-
dc.contributor.authorPodkovyrov, Victor N.-
dc.contributor.authorKovalev, Sergey G.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-28T21:25:27Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-28T21:25:27Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-
dc.identifier.citationMaslov, A. V., Gareev, E. Z., Podkovyrov, V. N., Kovalev, S. G. (2020). Lithogeochemistry of clastic rocks of the Mashak Formation (western slope of the South Urals): In search of “camouflaged” pyroclastics. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Earth Sciences, 65 (1), 121–145.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2020.107-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/17966-
dc.description.abstractThe article attempts to solve the problem of the presence of “camouflaged” pyroclastics in sandstones and fine-grained clastic rocks of the Middle Riphean Mashak Formation of the Southern Urals based on litho- and geochemical methods and approaches. As a result of the studies, it was established that in the NKM–GM diagram, the compositional field of silt-clayey rocks of the Mashak Formation is comparable with several clusters of Jurassic slates of the Greater Caucasus, containing volcanogenic material, while the clusters of Paleogene tuffs of the Ukrainian Carpathians and the Gromashor Formation (Pai-Khoi) have a different location. On the (Na2O + K2O) – GM diagram, in the indicated field, are situated two of four clusters of metatuffoids and mixed volcanic-sedimentary rocks of the Strelna Group (Kola Peninsula), and one of two clusters of tuffs of the Redkino horizon (Vendian of the East European Platform). The same is true for a number of other examples. In the diagram (Na2O + K2O) – FM, none of the four clusters of tuffs and tuffopelites of the Ordovician of the Arga-Tas zone of the Momsky horst-anticlinorium and none of the six clusters of acidic tuffs and tuffites of Ukrainian Carpathians fit in, etc. Consequently, the localization of the compositional field of silt-clayey rocks of the Mashak Formation in the above and a number of other diagrams shows that clusters of various volcanic-terrigenous rocks, metatuffosiltstones, metatuffoids, slates, etc., containing a certain admixture of volcanic products, coincide with the diagrams in half or fewer of the cases. Thus, the analysis of the absolute contents and indicator ratios of trace elements inherent in sandstones and clayey rocks, values of petrochemical modules and the systematics of rare-earth elements (REE) does not allow us to state with certainty that magmatic processes, including subsynchronous sedimentation, were the main source of their constituent material.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe studies were supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant no. 19-17-00099, A. V. Maslov, analysis and interpretation of the results).en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. Earth Sciences;Volume 65; Issue 1-
dc.subjectSouthern Uralsen_GB
dc.subjectMiddle Ripheanen_GB
dc.subjectMashak Formationen_GB
dc.subjectsandstonesen_GB
dc.subjectclay rocksen_GB
dc.subjectlithogeochemistryen_GB
dc.titleLithogeochemistry of clastic rocks of the Mashak Formation (western slope of the South Urals): In search of “camouflaged” pyroclasticsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
121-145.pdf5,53 MBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.