Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17859
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorAnaniev, Vitaliy G.-
dc.contributor.authorBukharin, Mikhail D.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-26T11:30:46Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-26T11:30:46Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-
dc.identifier.citationAnaniev V. G., Bukharin M. D. On the history of the Museum of Petersburg Theological Academy after the Revolution: A letter of S. A. Zhebelev to N. Ya. Marr. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2020, vol. 36, issue 1, pp. 171–178.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.114-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/17859-
dc.description.abstractAfter the revolution of 1917 the fate of practically all museums, in particular those based on the history of religions, changed. The collection of the Museum of the St. Petersburg Spiritual academy was repeatedly reorganized: it was moved to other institutions and joined other collections. The only way to keep sense of the museum’s collection — scientific, educational, historical and cultural — was the shift of its main focus — from religion to history and archaeology. For this very reason, in 1919 the collection was moved to the Petrograd Archaeological Institute. In 1925, at the time of reorganization of the Institute, the question concerning the fate of the collection had to be resolved. Professor of Classical studies S. A. Zhebelev proposed a project to preserve the collection of the Museum of the Spiritual academy. In a letter to academic N. Ya. Marr, he suggested creating an archaeological museum of the Russian Academy of History of Material Culture on the basis of its funds. In this very way, the problem of maintaining sense of the collection would be solved — to present history of religions as an educational product with a high scientific potential and to open the large archaeological museum, which gave the Academy of History of Material Culture a new status. Besides, realization of an old dream of Zhebelev and Marr would provide the opportunity to open the first purely archaeological museum of academic scale in Leningrad. S. A. Zhebelev’s plan was not implemented and funds of the former Museum of Spiritual academy were dispersed between the Russian Museum and the Hermitage, however the letter of S. A. Zhebelev to N. Ya. Marr is an important document, earlier unpublished, shedding light on the fate of one of the main museum collections on the study of history of religions in Russia and the USSR.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article was done for the project No. 18-18-00367 of Russian Science Foundation “The World History in Soviet Science, Culture and Education in 1917–1947”.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 36; Issue 1-
dc.subjectthe study of religionen_GB
dc.subjectchurch archeologyen_GB
dc.subjectcollectionen_GB
dc.subjectS. A. Zhebeleven_GB
dc.subjectN. Ya. Marren_GB
dc.titleOn the history of the Museum of Petersburg Theological Academy after the Revolution: A letter of S. A. Zhebelev to N. Ya. Marren_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
171-178.pdf600,97 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.