Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17857
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorPirni, Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorNikolaeva, Zhanna V.-
dc.contributor.authorIgnateva, Sofia V.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-26T11:22:00Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-26T11:22:00Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-
dc.identifier.citationPirni A., Nikolaeva Zh. V., Ignateva S. V. Mutual recognition: A dialogue between Italian and Russian perspectives. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2020, vol. 36, issue 1, pp. 141–156.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.112-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/17857-
dc.description.abstractThe knowledge and understanding of kaleidoscopic and hypermodern societies rely heavily on the term “recognition.” This term carried a great deal of significance in the Russian philosophical tradition, but attracts less attention now. The main purpose of this paper is to offer a contribution to the discussion on this topic, by considering both the Russian and the European philosophical traditions, with specific reference to the Italian perspective. The methodological focus is concerned with the two essential aspects of recognition: that of the interpersonal and that of the group. Our philosophical analysis of recognition endeavors to take into account first and foremost the problematic field of Otherness. The process of recognition of the Other is thus considered according to three stages of approval: cognitive, moral and social. Cognitive approval includes the identification of the Other as opposite to the group as well as to each individual. The moral stage contemplates concretization of social objectives and accepting the Other as a whole that should above all be respected and accepted. At the stage of social approval, the individual is being recognized within the social context of a group (closed social group) as recognition or rejection. Specifying the recognition leads to a reduction in the number of conflicts, the clarification of borders, and the acceptance of Otherness as an element of individuality. The contribution to the theory of recognition here outlined is new to the Russian scientific context, and may prove challenging in the context of Russian-Italian dialogue. It also constitutes an attempt to compare the common representations of Otherness with current theoretical developments. The theory is illustrated by analysis of closed social groups functioning as a promising series of case studies, in order to open up a renewed interest in research into social reality theories in both Russian and Italian contexts.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe reported study was funded by RFBR (Russian Foundation for Basic Research) according to the research project “The problem of identity in cultural exclusion zones in the urban environment” No. 18-011-00552.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 36; Issue 1-
dc.subjectrecognitionen_GB
dc.subjectacceptanceen_GB
dc.subjectOtheren_GB
dc.subjectidentityen_GB
dc.subjectclosed social groupsen_GB
dc.titleMutual recognition: A dialogue between Italian and Russian perspectivesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
141-156.pdf653,77 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.