Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17854
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorDanilov, Alexander N.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-26T11:01:32Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-26T11:01:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-
dc.identifier.citationDanilov A. N. The return of the dictatorship: A new perception of modernity. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2020, vol. 36, issue 1, pp. 105–115.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.109-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/17854-
dc.description.abstractThe article discusses versions of fighting for the political future of the world, the results of which are not yet predetermined. Development of the political process in the twenty-first century illustrates that the world is entering a stage of permanent crisis of liberal democracy. The democratic wave of the 1990s died out and led only to the growth of right-wing extremism, nihilism and nationalism all over the world. It happened not only in the governments that arose out of dictatorships at the end of the twentieth century, but also in some old democracies. Democracy has ceased to cultivate authoritative and strong leaders. Society cannot always be in transformation or trauma state. Sooner or later a new reality will be built. Social anomia is not a permanent process, as it would inevitably become part of normative system. The new authoritarianism is cultivated by the ineffectiveness of power, disbelief in its ability to curb the situation of chaos and discontent, and to bring life back to normal. Today, no country in the world can be a model for imitation. There is not any ideal that others would like to borrow. Building a new ideal of civilizational development is fixed through the disclosure of a complex ethical system in which value conflict acts as an inevitable component. Most of the post-Soviet countries failed to advance their societies to a more suitable level of economy, to reach the positions dictated by the modern information age, and to provide the population with new high standards of living. Convergent trends are becoming increasingly noticeable in the Republic of Belarus with authoritarian rule. Evolutionary nature is inherent in the Belarusian transformation. It is based on the mentality of the people and the social responsibility of government. The post-Soviet world is not in a hurry to part with acquired sovereignty and is not ready to share even a part of its rights with supranational structures.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 36; Issue 1-
dc.subjectdemocracyen_GB
dc.subjectnew authoritarianismen_GB
dc.subjectworld orderen_GB
dc.subjectvalue conflicten_GB
dc.subjecttransformationen_GB
dc.subjectpost-Soviet worlden_GB
dc.subjectnew convergent societyen_GB
dc.subjectsustainable developmenten_GB
dc.titleThe return of the dictatorship: A new perception of modernityen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
105-115.pdf620,66 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.