Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17022
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorSukharev, Oleg S.-
dc.contributor.authorVoronchikhina, Ekaterina N.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-06T15:54:16Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-06T15:54:16Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12-
dc.identifier.citationSukharev O. S., Voronchikhina E. N. (2019) Structural Analysis of Economic Growth in China: International Comparison Context. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 35, iss. 4, pp. 543–568.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2019.403-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/17022-
dc.description.abstractThe Chinese economy over the long term has shown relatively high average growth rates, even considering a gradual slowdown over the last several years. In this regard, it is important to identify features of this model and policies of economic growth in comparison with other countries. Purpose of this research is to conduct a structural analysis of the Chinese economic growth in comparison with the United States, Germany, Japan, and Russia, as well as to identify features of its structural dynamics and macroeconomic policy. The subject of investigation is models of economic growth in these countries, and approaches to macroeconomic growth policy in China and Russia that determine the contribution of GDP components and economic sectors to the rate of economic growth. The hypothesis is that the economy growth model is determined by the dominance of the components and sector in GDP. Three basic growth models are defined. The model based on the dominance of gross consumption in the USA and Russia, investment in China, and a mixed growth model in Germany and Japan. The Chinese economy is close to the “Schumpeterian” growth model. The Russian economy approximates the “Fisher” model, especially in terms of macroeconomic policy requirements. Therefore, to ensure the investment growth model, it is necessary, in addition to encouraging investments, to change the characteristics of structural dynamics, including change in macroeconomic policy instruments.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSt Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies;Volume 35; Issue 4-
dc.subjectempirical analysis of growthen_GB
dc.subjectGDP structure by expenditureen_GB
dc.subjectsectoral structure of the economyen_GB
dc.subjectcomparative analysisen_GB
dc.subjectmodel of economic growthen_GB
dc.titleStructural Analysis of Economic Growth in China: International Comparison Contexten_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 4

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
543_568.pdf1,41 MBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.