Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16993
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorBalashevich, Diana Dmitrievna-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-05T13:45:34Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-05T13:45:34Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12-
dc.identifier.citationBalashevich D. D. Discourse analysis of an interview about the Bulgarian Pomak wedding ceremony. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2019, 16 (4): 538–556.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2019.401-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/16993-
dc.description.abstractThe material of the article is a transcribed interview recording about a wedding ceremony of the middle of the 20th c. with an informant born in 1932, identifying herself as Pomak (Bulgarians- Muslims) and is a native speaker of the Smoljan subdialect of the Bulgarian Rhodope dialect. The relevance of the work is due to the increasing interest of modern humanities to religious minorities and the necessity of developing the most effective methods of field linguistics (based on the dialect material that is quickly disappearing due to social reasons) as well as the novelty of the original material. The article depicts cases of disclosure of information when there are no questions by using the question “what is called y+z?” or the question “do you have a lexeme x?,” by using a clarifying question, or by the question of repeated inquiry; the most frequent one turned out to be “what is called y+z?.” The article also considers the cases of categorical denial of the information proposed in the question, the lack of memories, the cases of a detailed answer or a one-word answer. The most effective questions are “do you have y+z?” and the question of repeated inquiry, resulting in the highest number of positive responses. Due to the dialectic nature of the narrative, the number of questions “do you have a lexeme x?” that aim at concretizing the meaning of a lexeme given by the interviewer was minimal, as the informant mentioned the marked lexis himself without any question being asked.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work was started with the support of grant RSF No. 14-18-01405 “From separation to symbiosis: languages and cultures of Southeast Europe in contact” and completed with the support of grant RSF No. 19- 18-00244 “Balkan bilingualism in dominant and equilibrium contact situations in diatopy, diachrony and diastration.”en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 16; Issue 4-
dc.subjectdiscourse analysisen_GB
dc.subjectrole of the question in narrativeen_GB
dc.subjectinterviewing methodsen_GB
dc.subjectlanguage code of the wedding ceremonyen_GB
dc.subjectPomaksen_GB
dc.titleDiscourse analysis of an interview about the Bulgarian Pomak wedding ceremonyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 4

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
538-556.pdf755,18 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.