Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16572
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Morozov, Viatcheslav | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-13T10:29:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-13T10:29:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Morozov V. Community Beyond Hegemony? Liberal Cosmopolitanism, Generic Emancipation and the Political. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2019, vol. 12, issue 3, pp. 340–356. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu06.2019.306 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16572 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article critically re-evaluates certain blind spots in the debate on the possibility of a cosmopolitan political community. It does so by addressing certain key areas where, in my view, remaining conceptual misunderstandings prevent a full articulation of the conflicting positions. In particular, I concentrate on the ontological differences between liberalism and poststructuralism which, as long as they are not laid plain, distort the exchange of ideas on the nature of the political and on the issues of identity, recognition and exclusion. I contend that in poststructuralist ontology antagonism remains the only force that can constitute an inside-outside boundary and thus establish an identity. Hence, one needs to agree with Sergei Prozorov when he insists that cosmopolitan politics can only be post-identitarian. I then analyse the differences between the two visions of generic post-identitarian politics identified by Prozorov — those of Alain Badiou and Giorgio Agamben. This analysis helps to highlight the thesis that even if we can conceive of a truly generic community that is not grounded in any identity and therefore does not presuppose external othering as a constitutive practice, we might still need antagonistic politics as the only means to make this community possible. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by institutional research funding (IUT20-39) of the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vestnik of St Petersburg University. International Relations;Volume 12; Issue 3 | - |
dc.subject | cosmopolitanism | en_GB |
dc.subject | antagonism | en_GB |
dc.subject | identity | en_GB |
dc.subject | othering | en_GB |
dc.subject | hegemony | en_GB |
dc.title | Community Beyond Hegemony? Liberal Cosmopolitanism, Generic Emancipation and the Political | en_GB |
dc.type | Book | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 3 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
340-356.pdf | 647,59 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.