Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16338
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorKeates, Susan G.-
dc.contributor.authorPostnov, Aleksander V.-
dc.contributor.authorKuzmin, Yaroslav V.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-13T17:51:40Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-13T17:51:40Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-
dc.identifier.citationKeates S. G., Postnov A. V., Kuzmin Y. V. Towards the Origin of Microblade Technology in Northeastern Asia. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2019, vol. 64, iss. 2, рp. 390–414.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2019.203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/16338-
dc.description.abstractMicroblade technology is one of the most remarkable phenomena in the Upper Paleolithic of northern Eurasia, primarily the northern and eastern regions of Asia. Here we present an overview of the most recent developments in attempting to understand the emergence and spread of this technology, based on data known for Siberia and the Russian Far East, Mongolia, China, Korea, and Japan. The main assumptions for selection of the earliest microblade complexes are: 1) the presence of three artifact types: wedge-shaped microcores; microblades; and retouched (utilized) microblades; 2) a reliable chronology based on critical evaluation of radiocarbon dates; and 3) the stratigraphic integrity of artifacts. The pressure flaking was a technique to make microblades, and this is important issue which was often not taken into account previously. Based on these criteria, the oldest microblade-bearing complexes for each of the regions listed above were selected. Using these data, we can conclude that the earliest evidence of microblade technology is known from the Korean Peninsula where it is dated to ca. 25,500–24,200 BP. In other regions (China, Siberia, Russian Far East and Japan), the first microblade assemblages are dated to ca. 21,100–19,400 BP. As a result of our analysis, two possible explanations for the emergence of microblade technology in northern and eastern Asia can be considered: 1) invention and diffusion from a single core area; and 2) independent creation in several places and subsequent expansion. Currently, we cannot solve this issue, but generate some suggestions which may bring us closer toward identifying its origin and spread. Factual data as presented in this paper can be used as a primary source for future research.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe article was prepared with the support of Tomsk State University grant program; State assignment number 0330-2016-2018; the Russian Science Foundation (RNF), grant number 14-50-00036.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 64; Issue 2-
dc.subjectUpper Paleolithicen_GB
dc.subjectmicroblade technologyen_GB
dc.subjectlithic analysisen_GB
dc.subjectchronologyen_GB
dc.subjectspatiotemporal patternsen_GB
dc.subjectAsiaen_GB
dc.titleTowards the Origin of Microblade Technology in Northeastern Asiaen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 2

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
390-414.pdf57,11 MBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.