Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15589
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Boguslavskaya, Yulia | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-29T12:48:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-29T12:48:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-03 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Boguslavskaya Yu. The member states’ contributions to NATO’s policy in Afghanistan during Donald Trump presidency. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2019, vol. 12, issue 1, pp. 40–57. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu06.2019.103 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15589 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In a currently highly competitive international environment, US goals of consolidating and strengthening NATO as well as bringing its present mission in Afghanistan to successful termination gain in significance. The success of these processes enhances the reputation of the United States as a powerful international actor. I checked the hypothesis that facing sharp critique from the United States president for free riding in NATO, those members who fail to meet the target of 2 per cent of GDP in their defense expenditure would choose to increase significantly their contributions to the Alliance’s efforts in Afghanistan. I did not find enough convincing empirical data to prove it. The contributions of allies rather reflect their power potentials and ambitions they pursue by cooperating in NATO framework. US allies remain able to define the scale of their contribution to collective efforts in NATO framework despite the US pressure. Broadening of the Alliance’s purview after the end of the Cold war provided member states with additional alternatives for choosing types of their involvement. My findings generally support the established view on intra-alliance bargaining process in scholarly literature. A wide range of missions in NATO framework and beyond it facilitates coalition formation for the United States with their numerous allies and partners. At the same time, if more major allies further choose to cooperate with Washington outside NATO, it will undermine its effectiveness and global role. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | St Petersburg State University | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vestnik of St Petersburg University. International Relations;Volume 12; Issue 1 | - |
dc.subject | NATO | en_GB |
dc.subject | United States | en_GB |
dc.subject | Afghanistan | en_GB |
dc.subject | alliance | en_GB |
dc.subject | politics of prestige | en_GB |
dc.title | The member states’ contributions to NATO’s policy in Afghanistan during Donald Trump presidency | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Issue 1 |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
40-57.pdf | 642,61 kB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.