Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/14981
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYanchenko, D. G.-
dc.contributor.authorStarovoytova, E. O.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T15:45:45Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-23T15:45:45Z-
dc.date.issued2018-09-
dc.identifier.citationYanchenko D. G., Starovoytova E. O. ‘Prospects for the economic development of the Chinese Eastern Railway after the Russo-Japanese War: the regional dimension and the St. Petersburg policy’, Modern History of Russia, vol. 8, no. 3, 2018, pp. 583–597.en_GB
dc.identifier.other10.21638/11701/spbu24.2018.303-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/14981-
dc.description.abstractThe management system in the «line side» of the Chinese Eastern Railway (CER) was subject to significant adjustments under the influence of external and internal factors after 1905. Russian officials, in cooperation with the members of the State Duma and the military officers, were regulating economic policy along the railway line, trying to counter the growing influence of Japan. The article is based on archival materials and regional periodicals. It is shown that after the end of the Russo-Japanese War and the suppression of the First Russian Revolution, the economic situation of the CER remained in the very focus of government attention. The historiographical review includes the works of modern Chinese researchers, little known to a wide range of readers, and highlights their view on the economic impact of the CER in the context of relations between China, Russia, and Japan in the early 20th century. The need to put the road into operation as quickly as possible on the eve of a clash with Japan led to the fact that after the war the budget funds had to be used to correct structural defects, modernize infrastructure, improve settlements along the road. The structure of government expenditures is analyzed. The construction of an alternative Amur railway, the needs of the domestic market of the empire required not only the redistribution of rolling stock but also the adjustment of the government’s course. Using the right to consider budget expenditures, the liberal opposition in the Duma tried to criticize the administrative and economic activities of the CER Society. However, the Ministry of Finance repulsed the deputies interests, just like the representatives of the military.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipСтатья выполнена при поддержке Российского научного фонда, проект № 18-18-00142 «Центр и регионы: экономическая политика правительства на окраинах Российской империи (1894–1917)».en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesModern History of Russia;Volume 8; Issue 3-
dc.subjectChinese Eastern Railwayen_GB
dc.subjectRussian-Japanese Waren_GB
dc.subjectState Dumaen_GB
dc.subjectFirst Russian Revolutionen_GB
dc.subjectMinistry of Financeen_GB
dc.subjecteconomyen_GB
dc.subjectexclusion zoneen_GB
dc.subjectrailway constructionen_GB
dc.titleProspects for the economic development of the Chinese Eastern Railway after the Russo-Japanese War: the regional dimension and the St. Petersburg policyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Appears in Collections:Issue 3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
03-Yanchenko.pdf834,31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.