The Caucasian Viceroy Michael Vorontsov and his Fraction
Loading...
Files
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
St Petersburg State University
Abstract
The article deals with the patronage network of the first Caucasian Viceroy Michael Vorontsov.
The research is based on the patronizing letters of the Viceroy to the Director of the Caucasian
Committee Vladimir Butkov, as well as on the correspondence between Michael Vorontsov
and employees and supporters. Michael Vorontsov’s fraction consisted of representatives from
various social groups: military, officials, local nobility, religious leaders, merchant circles. This
diversity is explained both by the peculiarities of the personality of the Caucasian Viceroy,
who combined the qualities of a nobleman, an army leader, a manager, and the socio-political
conditions of the region which was led by Michael Vorontsov. The Caucasian Viceroy
managed to form a reliable patronage network, which excluded the opposition and was the
basis of the regional autocracy of the Viceroy. The administrative apparatus was made up of
experienced officials who served with Vorontsov in the Novorossiysk region. Among the local
population who supported the Viceroy was the Georgian princely clans, including the Orbeliani
family, as well as the Armenian merchants. The formation of a loyal fraction was also
necessary in the context of a confrontation with the Ministerial bureaucracy, whose ties with
local institutions were suppressed or extremely formalized. Loyalty of clients was provided by
promotions, awards and material prosperity. The system created by Vorontsov proved to be
durable. His successors also relied in the capital on the Caucasian Committee and its Director,
and within the Viceroyalty — on the same corporations and individuals who were patronized
by the first Caucasian Viceroy.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Urushadze A. T., Sulaberidze Z. N. The Caucasian Viceroy Michael Vorontsov and his Fraction. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2020, vol. 65, iss. 2, рp. 375–391.