Some circumstances of the resignation of the military minister Sukhomlinov
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
St Petersburg State University
Abstract
The article analyzes the significance of PR campaigns in the course of the political struggle on the
eve of the February Revolution. Here we describe one example of a PR campaign against the Military
Minister V. A. Sukhomlinov. The authors demonstrate the role of A. I. Guchkov and M. M. Andronikov as
their initiators. The propagandistic texts which discredit V. A. Sukhomlinov are introduced into scientific
discourse and analyzed for the first time. The definition of ‘public relations’ and ‘propaganda’ is made. The authors explain the thesis of historian B. N. Mironov about using PR technologies in the Russian Empire’s
political struggles at the beginning of the 20th century. A. V. Evdokimov and F. A. Seleznev suppose
that the counter-elite of the Russian Empire used not propaganda in its struggle for power, which leads to
monologue, but PR technologies, which suppose a dialogue with society through the mass media on the
eve and during World War I. The authors analyze PR campaigns against Gen. Sukhomlinov as an element
of the broader information warfare waged by the counter-elite of the Russian empire against the monarch
and a section of the loyal elite finally resulting in the February Revolution. The role of the leader of the
Octobrists, A. I. Guchkov, and the newspaper ‘Vechernee Vremya’ in the organization of the PR campaign
for discrediting Col. Myasoedov in 1912 is also demonstrated. Also the role of Prince M. M. Andronikov
in the creation and distribution of information to discredit the Military Minister V. A. Sukhomlinov is
also proven by the authors. The identities of the assistants of Andronikov, which helped him to draw up
the anonymous letter about Sukhomlinov and other senior statesmen are uncovered. The authors prove
that A. I. Guchkov and M. M. Andronikov cooperated in the struggle against V. A. Sukhomlinov. The PR
campaign of 1912 had partial success. S. N. Myasoedov was dismissed but V. A. Sukhomlinov saved his
public post. The PR campaign of 1915 was successful because Gen. Sukhomlinov was dismissed. PR
technologies on the eve of February Revolution became more and more effective weapons of political
struggle. During the process of writing the article 35 bibliographical titles were used. Refs 39.
Description
Citation
Seleznev F. A., Evdokimov A. V. Some circumstances of the resignation of the military minister Sukhomlinov. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2017, vol. 62, issue 3, pp. 481–496.