Network community member’s status-role representation in the online forum dialogues
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
St Petersburg State University
Abstract
The article deals with lexical units that nominate communicative statuses and communicative
roles of the Internet forum participants, as well as speech statements containing specified
lexemes with metacommunicative function. The research is a case study of three popular
Belarusian Internet forums. Poll results of 18 active members of one of the online forums
(the experience of communication on the site is 5–12 years) were madditionally used. The
analysis of the status-role nominations used by the Internet forum participants in order
to regulate communicative relationships allowed to reveal the main features of forum
community members communicative consciousness. The status-role ratio of the online
forum participants is determined by the character of the forum. To maintain the online
forum community its members have to perform certain communication roles connected with
generating, distributing, and consuming content, as well as regulating the users’ interaction in
relation to this content. There are four main factors at play in terms of participants hierarchy
and opportunities for leadership: communicative power possession (administrators, global
moderators, moderators), communicative activity level (“topikstartery”, inspirers, users,
“yuzery”), cognitive qualities and demonstrated level of user competence (gurus, experts,
“aksakaly”, connoisseur, “chayniki”, “lamery”), commitment to specific, evaluative-marked
speech behaviour types (violators, critics, “fludery”, “fleymery”, “neadekvaty”, graphomaniacs, “povtorshchiki”). The status-role names are used by forum users to label meaningful statusrole
positions and to determine the participants’ roles in communication.
Description
Citation
Pivovarchyk, T. A. (2019). Network community member’s status-role representation in the online forum dialogues. Media Linguistics, 6(3), 402–413.