Reorientation ability in redtail splitfin (Xenotoca eiseni): Role of environmental shape, rearing in group and exposure time
Loading...
Files
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
St Petersburg State University
Abstract
When passively disoriented in an enclosed space, animals use the geometry of the
environment (angular cues and metrically distinct surfaces) to find a position. Whether
the ability to deal with geometry is a mechanism available at birth, with little influence
of previous experience with the same kind of information, is still debated. We
reared fish (Xenotoca eiseni) in tanks of different shape (circular or rectangular) either
singly or in group and tested at different ages (at one week or one, five or ten months).
Fish were trained to reorient in an enclosure with a distinctive geometry (a rectangular
arena) and a blue wall providing non-geometric, featural information. Then, they
were tested after an affine transformation that created conflict between geometric and
non-geometric information as learned during training. We found that all fish, since
one-week old, use significantly more the geometry of the enclosure for reorientation
independently from the experience in circular or rectangular tanks. At one month of
age, we observed a modulatory effect of rearing experience during learning with an
advantage of individuals reared singly in rectangular cages, but no difference was
evident at test. Furthermore, such effect on learning propensity disappeared later in
development, i.e., when fish were trained at five or ten months of age. These results
confirm that the use of geometric information provided by the shape of an enclosure is
spontaneous and inborn, and that a modulatory effect of experience can appear briefly
during ontogeny, but experience is not essentially needed to deal with geometry.
Description
Citation
Sovrano, V.A. and Chiandetti, C. 2017. Reorientation ability in redtail splitfin (Xenotoca eiseni): Role of environmental shape, rearing in group and exposure time. Bio. Comm. 62(1): 48–56.