Considerations on Two Сruces Philologorum (Ael. NA 15, 25)
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
St Petersburg State University
Abstract
The present article aims to elucidate an interesting narrative that forms a portion of Aelian’s
paradoxographic work Περὶ ζῴων ἰδιότητος (On the Characteristics of Animals, Lat. De natura
animalium). The passage under discussion describes some horned animals of oriental origin
that were involved in the annual fighting contests during a one-day competition held on the
initiative of a “great king of India” — probably Chandragupta (4th–3rd c. BC), the founder
of the Maurya dynasty. Aelian’s chapter (NA 15, 15) was perhaps taken from Megasthenes’s
Ἰνδικά (Description of India). The passage includes two hapax legomena referring to two species
of animals: †μέσοι† and †ὕαιναι†. The first of these should be identified with the Ladakh
urial (Ovis orientalis vignei Blyth); cf. Prasun məṣé ‘ram, urial’ (< Vedic mēṣá- m. ‘ram’). Aelian’s
exact description of the horned animals called †ὕαιναι† clearly demonstrates that the alleged
“striped hyena” (Gk. ὕαινα) must represent the chinkara, i. e., the Indian gazelle (Gazella
bennettii Sykes). The Indo-Aryan term for ‘chinkara’ (Ved. hariṇá- m ‘Indian gazelle’, hariṇī́- f.
‘female gazelle’; cf. Pa. and Pk. hariṇa- m., hariṇī- f.) suggests that the corrupted form in Aelian’s
passage should be emended as ὑάριναι [hyárinai]. This seems a near-optimal adaptation
of the Pali or Prakrit appellative háriṇā pl. ‘chinkaras’.
Description
Citation
Kaczyńska E. Considerations on Two Сruces Philologorum (Ael. NA 15, 25). Philologia Classica 2021, 16 (1), 32–39.